[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Extra details for postboxes

2010-08-05 Thread vclaw
I have created a proposal for tagging extra details of postboxes. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_post_box It includes tags for the type of postbox, number of apertures, royal cypher, type of mail accepted, opening hours, and indoor. All of these are optional, addit

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Extra details for postboxes

2010-08-05 Thread vclaw
On 05/08/2010 17:03, Tobias Knerr wrote: vclaw wrote: I have created a proposal for tagging extra details of postboxes. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_post_box It includes tags for the type of postbox, number of apertures, royal cypher, type of mail accepted

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Extra details for postboxes

2010-08-05 Thread vclaw
On 05/08/2010 23:29, Tobias Knerr wrote: On 05/08/2010 18:52, vclaw wrote: On 05/08/2010 17:03, Tobias Knerr wrote: I suggest a more generic approach for the mounting/anchor information - a key like this could be used for lots of different features, such as post boxes, clocks, waste bins or

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - social club

2010-09-26 Thread vclaw
I have created a proposal for mapping social clubs, by tagging as leisure=social_club. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/social_club From the proposal: "A social club is place where members can meet and socialise, and usually includes bars, restaurants and games. They dif

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - social club

2010-09-27 Thread vclaw
On 27/09/2010 01:36, SomeoneElse wrote: On 26/09/2010 23:35, vclaw wrote: I have created a proposal for mapping social clubs, by tagging as leisure=social_club. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/social_club Not amenity=social_club? That seems to be in more