[Tagging] Questions about public transport tagging

Hello, I have quite a few questions about Public Transport related tagging in Openstreetmap. My first question is about the "interval:conditional" & "opening_hours" tag for bus routes. The "Bus Route" page on the OSM wiki mentions this tag, but the train route or "public transport" route page d

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - crossing=priority

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing%3Dpriority Here is my first proposal for a tag to describe pedestrian crossings where the pedestrian has right of way over all vehicles on the road f

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - crossing=priority

Yes, most likely this won't be required. However I have kept it there in case it works differently in other countries. Maybe not all zebra crossings in Singapore have belisha beacons (for example, I don't know if this is true). That is why I am leaving it open for discussion for now, if after th

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - crossing=priority

Hello everyone, I haven't really explained myself since I cancelled this proposal 7 days ago. However, just now this proposal was mentioned on WeeklyOSM, so I just want to clarify why I have cancelled this proposal. >From reading all these comments, it is clear a "crossing=priority" is not a >

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr:interpolation_on_closed_ways_and_nodes Quick proposal I just created to accept this form of tagging. This follows from a discussion on the Talk-GB mailing list. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-December/025553.html

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

tiple mappers to switch up the taggong scheme. Thanks, IpswichMapper -- 21 Dec 2020, 15:19 by lon...@denofr.de: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 02:37:08PM +0100, ipswichmapper--- via Tagging wrote: > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr:interpolation_on_closed

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

s? >>> >>> Also, I had linked the talk-gb thread, which discusses how >>> addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes is already standard. That is >>> the problem with suggesting a new tag. This proposal would now require >>> informing multiple mappers t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

ken in NYC) IpswichMapper --- 21 Dec 2020, 19:44 by kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com: > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 2:15 PM ipswichmapper--- via Tagging <> > tagging@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > >> What do you mean by this? You would have to tag with addr:range=no, as that >>

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

pared > to trying to explain in on a mailing list. > > Thanks,  > IpseichMapper  > -- > > > > 23 Dec 2020, 20:38 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > >> >> >> sent from a phone >> >>> On 23. Dec 2020, at 20:12, ipswichmapper--- via Tagging >>&

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

106 etc. >>> >>> Renderers can use "19-100 to 19-200" >>> >>> Hypens would be accepted, but this is clearer. >>> >>> The problem is that now you will have to get every single renderer and >>> geocoder to understand this (which will take mon