What do you mean by this? You would have to tag with addr:range=no, as that is not a default value.
However, don't see this as a downside. Currently, software such as OSMand interprets hypenated addresses as a range anyway, so requirement to tag addr:range=no would be a benefit. IpswichMapper -- 21 Dec 2020, 18:27 by zelonew...@gmail.com: > Would this work for addressing schemes that use a hyphenated prefix? > > In Hawaii, addresses outside of the city of Honolulu use a two-digit prefix > in addresses to determine which sector of the island an address is located. > So an address might be something like "99-123 Kamehameha Highway". Would > this scheme work for an apartment complex that's addressed something like > 99-100 through 99-200 <Street Name>? > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 1:15 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> > tagging@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > >> I like this new tag. >> >> I had proposing something like that on my TODO list. >> >> I added it in >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96211869 >> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96211869#map=17/50.07743/19.93381&layers=N> >> to mark addr:housenumber=1-3 as a single address, not a range >> (based on survey that I remember well) >> >> Dec 21, 2020, 19:05 by >> tagging@openstreetmap.org>> : >> >>> Okay. In this case I can rename to proposal page to "addr:range". >>> >>> This new tag: >>> >>> - applies to nodes and closed ways that have addr:housenumber >>> - "addr:range=n" means every nth house is counted in a range >>> - "addr:range=even/odd" means every even/odd house is counted >>> - "addr:range=all" means every house is counted (default value for a >>> housenumber tag with a hyphen in it if no range is given). >>> - "addr:range=no" means that the housenumber tag is NOT a range of values >>> but rather a single housenumber. >>> >>> "addr:range=all" is the default because that is what the wiki says and >>> what software like streetcomplete suggests. Many buildings with multiple >>> housenumbers are tagged like this. >>> >>> However, software can create different defaults for different countries. >>> For example, in the UK a hypenated address most probably means a range of >>> even/odd addresses (so "addr:range=2") >>> >>> What are your thoughts on this? >>> >>> Also, I had linked the talk-gb thread, which discusses how >>> addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes is already standard. That is >>> the problem with suggesting a new tag. This proposal would now require >>> informing multiple mappers to switch up the taggong scheme. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> IpswichMapper >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> 21 Dec 2020, 15:19 by >>> lon...@denofr.de>>> : >>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 02:37:08PM +0100, ipswichmapper--- via Tagging >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr:interpolation_on_closed_ways_and_nodes >>>>> >>>>> Quick proposal I just created to accept this form of tagging. This >>>>> follows from a discussion on the Talk-GB mailing list. >>>>> >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-December/025553.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please comment if there are issues with accepting this form of tagging. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I dislike this kind of tagging to the point that I've refused to >>>> support it in Nominatim in the past. See >>>> https://github.com/osm-search/Nominatim/issues/565>>>> for the full >>>> disucssion. >>>> >>>> The problem is that it makes the interpretation of addr:housenumber and >>>> addr:interpolation dependent on the presence of another tag. >>>> >>>> Note that addr:housenumber=40-48 can be a valid housenumber. Example: >>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285077586>>>> So to know if the tag >>>> needs >>>> to be interpreted as a single housenumber or as a housenumber range >>>> you need to check if the node/way has a addr:interpolation tag in addtion >>>> to the addr:housenumber tag. >>>> >>>> Similarly, a way with addr:interpolation needs to be processed in two >>>> different ways: If a addr:housenumber is present, then assume it's a >>>> building and parse the addr:housenumber tag to get the range. If no >>>> housenumber is on the way, assume it is a good old interpolation line >>>> and look at the housenumbers along the nodes of the way. >>>> >>>> I find this kind of double meaning for tagging confusing and error-prone. >>>> But I might be fighting wind mills here. >>>> >>>> Sarah >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
