Okay. In this case I can rename to proposal page to "addr:range".
This new tag: - applies to nodes and closed ways that have addr:housenumber - "addr:range=n" means every nth house is counted in a range - "addr:range=even/odd" means every even/odd house is counted - "addr:range=all" means every house is counted (default value for a housenumber tag with a hyphen in it if no range is given). - "addr:range=no" means that the housenumber tag is NOT a range of values but rather a single housenumber. "addr:range=all" is the default because that is what the wiki says and what software like streetcomplete suggests. Many buildings with multiple housenumbers are tagged like this. However, software can create different defaults for different countries. For example, in the UK a hypenated address most probably means a range of even/odd addresses (so "addr:range=2") What are your thoughts on this? Also, I had linked the talk-gb thread, which discusses how addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes is already standard. That is the problem with suggesting a new tag. This proposal would now require informing multiple mappers to switch up the taggong scheme. Thanks, IpswichMapper -- 21 Dec 2020, 15:19 by lon...@denofr.de: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 02:37:08PM +0100, ipswichmapper--- via Tagging wrote: > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr:interpolation_on_closed_ways_and_nodes >> >> Quick proposal I just created to accept this form of tagging. This follows >> from a discussion on the Talk-GB mailing list. >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-December/025553.html >> >> >> Please comment if there are issues with accepting this form of tagging. >> > > I dislike this kind of tagging to the point that I've refused to > support it in Nominatim in the past. See > https://github.com/osm-search/Nominatim/issues/565 for the full disucssion. > > The problem is that it makes the interpretation of addr:housenumber and > addr:interpolation dependent on the presence of another tag. > > Note that addr:housenumber=40-48 can be a valid housenumber. Example: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285077586 So to know if the tag needs > to be interpreted as a single housenumber or as a housenumber range > you need to check if the node/way has a addr:interpolation tag in addtion > to the addr:housenumber tag. > > Similarly, a way with addr:interpolation needs to be processed in two > different ways: If a addr:housenumber is present, then assume it's a > building and parse the addr:housenumber tag to get the range. If no > housenumber is on the way, assume it is a good old interpolation line > and look at the housenumbers along the nodes of the way. > > I find this kind of double meaning for tagging confusing and error-prone. > But I might be fighting wind mills here. > > Sarah > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
