sent from a phone
> On 17 Apr 2023, at 01:08, António Madeira wrote:
>
> The question is: is it relevant?
no, it is not the question, the requirement is: does it exist?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap
sent from a phone
> On 21 Apr 2023, at 16:26, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> shop=printing_on_objects ? seems more clear than shop=screenprinting
screenprinting is about the specific technique, in Polish I think it is
Druk sitowy
I think if the shop is specialized in this kin
sent from a phone
> On 24 Apr 2023, at 16:03, Timothy Noname wrote:
>
> Probably a tagging error by someone who doesn't know the correct tags like
> skillion and gabled.
it’s probably a skillion roof, single pitch, wouldn’t expect a gabled or hipped
roof, but who knows. It isn’t an “error”
sent from a phone
> On 20 Apr 2023, at 22:04, Marc_marc wrote:
>
> is roof:shape=pitched an imprecise value ?
as you ask about imprecise, what about “round” or “many”?
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/roof:shape#values___
Tagging mailing list
sent from a phone
> On 8 May 2023, at 10:39, Sebastian Felix Zappe
> wrote:
>
> For example, a door width or step count should be tagged on the node that
> represents the entrance door, not the café PoI node inside the building (or
> worse, the building polygon)
but this requires to conne
sent from a phone
> On 15 May 2023, at 09:18, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tag it with office=government + government=emergency. "
>
>
> One of 'my' cases are "Fire Control Centres" where directions are given to
> bush fire fighters in the field.
>
> Thoughts???
I think this woul
Am Di., 16. Mai 2023 um 13:33 Uhr schrieb :
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> As promised I will make separate emails with our tagging questions and
> proposals that we want to add to OSM for our app.
>
> With our On Wheels app we give more objective information to wheelchair
> users about dimensions of the
sent from a phone
> On 12. Aug 2019, at 12:32, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> From what I've found (which may be wrong or I've misinterpreted it)
> autopistas are
> highway=motorway. Autovias are harder to categorize, but seem to be
> theoretically
> highway=trunk even though in practise some of the
sent from a phone
> On 12. Aug 2019, at 15:36, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Where a country-wide classification exists, it is usual for this to be
> reflected in the
> numbering scheme and the signage.
people are often writing about this, but from the German situation, where I
have been digging
sent from a phone
> On 12. Aug 2019, at 16:38, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> may not be entirely
> predictable (especially if we don't have access to traffic statistics) and
> the only objectively
> verifiable data we have is the signage.
no, we also have our knowledge about the size and importanc
sent from a phone
> On 12. Aug 2019, at 18:02, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> I don't think it's unavoidable - presumably you can just ignore the wikidata
> stuff and carry on as before?
I had thought so as well, but then I saw the edit which removed the whole
template information from the page
sent from a phone
> On 12. Aug 2019, at 18:02, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> I'm concerned that some wikidata entries are just plain wrong -
AFAIK the template is not filled from wikidata.org but rather from a wikidata
installation on OpenStreetMap-Foundation servers (or for OpenStreetMap but on
sent from a phone
> On 13. Aug 2019, at 02:21, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think your confusing tagging with rendering.
>
> Tagging is what is on the ground.
> The road from Toulouse toward Lyon may physically change between the two, so
> the tagging follows that (I don't think
sent from a phone
> On 13. Aug 2019, at 05:19, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> Changing the classification from trunk to
> primary to trunk again, in the middle of a rural area, breaks the
> network.
it breaks the trunk network, but if there isn’t a trunk network (according to
what is consid
sent from a phone
> On 13. Aug 2019, at 13:18, Paul Allen wrote:
>
>
> In my opinion, tagging the trunk roads (and secondary roads) passing through
> that city
> as residential would be very unhelpful.
yes, this is a discussion we also had over weeks and months in Italy, many
years ago, w
sent from a phone
> On 13. Aug 2019, at 16:02, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Which diverged into this thread. We've come full circle.
I am aware, but apparently from time to time you have to repeat and explain the
outcome of older discussions to bring those on board who have joined later ;-)
Ch
sent from a phone
> On 14. Aug 2019, at 07:20, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> natural=valley + valley=canyon etc
this would also be my preference, presupposed we can come up with definitions
for these valley subtypes that make sense.
Cheers Martin ___
sent from a phone
> On 14. Aug 2019, at 10:31, Michael Patrick wrote:
>
> 5. For international features, the National Geospatial Agency GeoNames Search
> page ( http://geonames.nga.mil/namesgaz/ ) enables you to look up the
> classifications, and what they are called in the local language(s)
sent from a phone
> On 14. Aug 2019, at 22:27, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> There are some offices that can be assumed to be without access by general
> public
> like office=company.
I would generally think of office=* as not accessible for the general public,
at least this was the initial
sent from a phone
> On 14. Aug 2019, at 23:30, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> Unfortunately many office=* tags represent something that is accessible
yes it is unfortunate
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetma
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 05:33, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> Is there evidence or documentation that the accepted and historic
> method of documenting new, unused or little-used tags is to create a
> Tag:key=value page, without discussion first?
>
> I'm new here, but it looks
sent from a phone
On 15. Aug 2019, at 05:33, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>> "The ideal of forcing a proposal ... does not fly with me due to the
>> probability of being cast as 'abandoned'."
>
> Using the proposal namespace should not force the original page author
> to do anything else in the P
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 05:33, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> (I don't think such abandoned tag proposal pages
> should be deleted, as long as the tag is still in the database, but
> the status change is helpful.)
I would extend this to all tags that have been at least once i
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 13:53, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> What is perfectly fine, as long as proposals were actually abandoned.
what is your definition of “abandoned” here? E.g. if a page is in draft or
proposed status and has not been brought to voting and not been modifi
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 13:53, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> For many popular tags there are abandoned proposals, tags itself are in
> active use.
„many popular tags“ have been formally proposed, have not been voted on, and
are still in active use, with a significantly diffe
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 15:49, Jmapb via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> For anything that's not a bicycle shop but still does bicycle repairs
> (I've seen cafes, car repair shops, outdoor shops, and even a church
> with this service), consider just adding the
> "service:bicycle:repair=y
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 15:54, marc marc wrote:
>
> - keep booking=* for the few booking.com urls that currently exist
IMHO we should not reserve tags named with a common word like „booking“ for a
commercial service. Their key could be “booking.com” (provided we want these
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 13:29, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> of the new page mentions that this may be a problem because
> amenity=studio is also used for TV, Radio and Music recording studios.
yes, IMHO we should completely avoid the term “studio”, as it can refer to lots
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 14:16, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> sense for house painters, it should be office=painter (or, better,
> office=decorator).
> If I want somebody to paint my house I expect him to apply paint to my house,
> not to his
> own office, so he doesn't (normally) per
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 15:26, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> How about "craft=artist" then? The tag "craft=atelier" was described
> as for any type of artist: "workshop of a ...professional artist in
> the fine or decorative arts"
I would not have thought to put artists into
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 18:25, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> I've just tried it on a bus route containing a roundabout locally and it
> coped OK.
I’m usually splitting roundabouts to contain only the part that is in the
route. We’re splitting all roads for routes (or other prope
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 16:59, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Yes, but under the current system (which is probably too deeply embedded to
> fix) an office can
> be one of two basic types:
>
> 1) A place for doing paperwork or other administrative tasks.
>
> 2) A place selling service
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 16:59, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> A craft=painter (current meaning) is where paperwork is done and perhaps
> where equipment is stored, but it is not where the actual craft of decorating
> takes place.
a painter is somehow special in this, but not the only
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 18:06, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> "craft=artist" is much better in my view - people are far more likely to know
> what it means
+1, craft=atelier makes zero sense, apart that it is French/German and not
English, it is describing a place (artist’s studi
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 20:38, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Ummm, you seem to contradict yourself there. Painters/decorators work at
> their craft
> wherever their craft is needed, not in their office/storage space.
> Carpenters are the same.
rereading myself it seems I haven’t
sent from a phone
On 15. Aug 2019, at 20:38, Paul Allen wrote:
>> will have much more extensive storage requirements than painters do (e.g.
>> scaffolding or concrete workers/formwork).
>
> A dedicated storage area is not a shop, or an office, or a workshop.
true, but the typical situatio
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2019, at 17:48, Jmapb wrote:
>
> Also note that for self-service bike repair we have
> "amenity=bicycle_repair_station" -- presumably not the best tag for this
> community centre bike repair service (it sounds like volunteers do the
> repair work, not the user) b
sent from a phone
On 15. Aug 2019, at 23:25, marc marc wrote:
>> why would you not do it for roundabouts?
>
> when we split a building in several parts, we keep one building=*
> and use several building:part
>
> for roundabouts, the tag is the same. for the whole roundabouts and for
> part
sent from a phone
On 15. Aug 2019, at 17:03, marc marc wrote:
>> service. Their key could be “booking.com”
>
> so somes firms have a too common name and need a key with a tld
> and somes no ?
no, it is not about a common _name_ , the problem is that the name is an
existing generic word, p
sent from a phone
> On 16. Aug 2019, at 00:20, Peter Elderson wrote:
>
> Not seldom I have to check and repair 10-15 route relations after one edit
> (most often a split of a way to allow a route to attach there) on the map.
which editing software do you use?
Cheers Martin
__
sent from a phone
> On 16. Aug 2019, at 02:27, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
> I would suggest we move artist from the craft discussion on to its own thread.
agreed. Artists merit their own key, putting them under craft doesn’t seem like
a good choice.
Cheers,
Martin
sent from a phone
> On 16. Aug 2019, at 09:02, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> I've been intending to work on a proposal but haven't had a chance -
> worthwhile?
IMHO what may be needed is “workshop” rather than business. We are already
tagging many kinds of businesses with the tags amenity,
sent from a phone
> On 16. Aug 2019, at 15:13, ael wrote:
>
> I could never see the point in tagging offices which are of no intrinsic
> interest except perhaps to office equipment suppliers.
The way I see it, we’re mapping the world, as it is. Not just places where the
general public may h
sent from a phone
> On 17. Aug 2019, at 13:22, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> But also no need not to map them should the
> owners wish.
you have mentioned the owner’s wishes already yesterday, but I wasn’t aware we
had a requirement that the owners must tolerate having their property mapped.
So fa
sent from a phone
> On 17. Aug 2019, at 13:41, ael wrote:
>
> I would be all in favour of introducing "business" as long as it was
> not restricted in that way. Easy with various values.
what would be the definition , for profit? Private ownership? IMHO it would
probably make stuff more co
sent from a phone
> On 17. Aug 2019, at 13:49, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> That is, should wiki users and mappers feel free to add any newly
> documented values of craft=, shop=, building=, office=, and sport= to
> the Map Features wiki page, and the Key page (eg Key:office,
> Key:craft), o
sent from a phone
> On 17. Aug 2019, at 13:49, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
>
> I restarted the thread more recently with a specific example:
> craft=atelier had just been documented after being used a dozen times,
> and was added to the Key:craft page and to Map Features. My question
> is: w
sent from a phone
> On 17. Aug 2019, at 15:18, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Also out of courtesy.
yes, there may always be considerations from individual mappers to refrain from
mapping certain things , for different reasons like courtesy, respect etc., and
this is perfectly fine (more difficult
sent from a phone
> On 17. Aug 2019, at 17:09, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> 9326 of 9657 crop=yes is on landuse=farmland - it seems to me that it is
> not adding any information whatsoever.
certainly removing them would be even less useful? You could read it as a way
of stating that somethi
sent from a phone
> On 17. Aug 2019, at 22:36, ael wrote:
>
> But do we have any generic terms already? Unless
> you just mean office.
businesses can already be found in amenity (e.g. food and drink, pharmacies,
post offices, prisons (US), etc.), tourism, leisure, shop, craft, office,
heal
There haven’t been more replies here, but the discussion didn’t seem conclusive
either. Is everyone fine with the established tagging shop=bicycle and several
subtags for the details?
IMHO the mentioned subtags are fine, but I believe we should have a dedicated
main tag, these really aren’t b
sent from a phone
> On 18. Aug 2019, at 01:17, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> So at least we know it probably isn’t a meadow or a farmyard or an orchard?
and not used for pasture
Cheers Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
h
sent from a phone
> On 18. Aug 2019, at 11:53, ael wrote:
>
> Of course, the more specific tagging is right where there is a good
> match.
+1, and where there isn’t yet a good match I’d prefer to invent one.
Cheers
Martin
___
Tagging mailing lis
sent from a phone
> On 18. Aug 2019, at 08:39, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> For this I would suggest the
> key "farmland=cropland" or
ok
> "crop=field_cropland",
not ok IMHO, field cropland is a kind if field, not a kind of crop
> rather than crop=yes
to me this isn’t perfect (yes
sent from a phone
> On 18. Aug 2019, at 14:10, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Land in crop rotation may be left fallow for a year, with no crop. OTOH,
> where the land is very uneven then it might be used for nothing but pasture
> (sheep or goats are the usual "crop" on land like that).
+1, also whe
sent from a phone
> On 18. Aug 2019, at 14:43, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Maybe
> we shouldn't ever insist that mappers sort the routes they add, but I don't
> think
> we should discourage them if they want to put in that effort.
+1, this is my opinion as well. Sorted routes make it usually eas
sent from a phone
> On 18. Aug 2019, at 15:41, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Thinking about it, maybe we should reactivate landuse=pasture and add
> landuse=arable. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arable_land which makes the
> distinction between pasture, arable land, and land for permanent woody c
sent from a phone
> On 18. Aug 2019, at 17:41, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Ugly and probably breaks many explicit and implicit rules. You'll no doubt
> find out
> all the ways it is a bad idea very shortly.
for several names it is common to use variations of the name tag, like alt_name
reg_nam
sent from a phone
> On 18. Aug 2019, at 20:36, Rob Savoye wrote:
>
> Luckily a neighbor called it in, he wasn't home. using 'loc_name' or
> 'alt_name' makes sense. This entire area doesn't even exist in Google
> Maps, so people not using OSM couldn't find it till we gave directions
> on the ra
sent from a phone
> On 18. Aug 2019, at 23:06, Morten Lange via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> I am skeptical as that makes finding them less straightforward, if you are
> looking for [ a place where I can get my bicycle repaired or receive some
> help].
it will require you look for them explicit
sent from a phone
> On 19. Aug 2019, at 02:28, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> But trade= is better than generic business= for the workshop of an individual
> tradesperson.
by the time craft was introduced, it should probably have been “trade”, IIRR
the craft tag was invented by Germans and
sent from a phone
> On 19. Aug 2019, at 12:17, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, the key animal=* has also been used for zoo animals
> (see elephant, etc) and some of the values are rare, proposed separate
> features like animal=wellness and animal=cemetery.
I would not see a pro
sent from a phone
> On 19. Aug 2019, at 12:35, marc marc wrote:
>
> 16% of landuse=farmyard have a anima=* tag.
> I didn't understand what argument to hope that the
> current most used tag would change in favor of a marginal tag.
generally I would expect a farmyard to contain several buildin
sent from a phone
> On 19. Aug 2019, at 13:13, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So the produce key is used for the output, if that is live animals then they
> can be tagged that way.
> If the output is milk then produce=milk not produce=cow.
+1, similarly for chicken, which are usual
sent from a phone
> On 19. Aug 2019, at 15:20, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> similar and in many places it can be hard to distinguish hay meadow
> from grazing pasture during most of the year.
the presence of a fence aiming at keeping the animals inside may be an
indication, although not e
sent from a phone
> On 19. Aug 2019, at 15:28, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> If we remove the animal=yes tags, there are about 247 uses of animal=*
> on landuse=farmyard, landuse=meadow, and landuse=farmland combined, so
> it's not huge.
animal=yes/no would already be a quite useful generic
sent from a phone
> On 19. Aug 2019, at 17:01, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
> (I have elided most of the intermediate steps.)
and a lot of preparatory steps: you need to buy a computer, find a wall outlet
to plug it in, find the power button, find an internet provider and subscribe
to a plan
sent from a phone
> On 20. Aug 2019, at 00:06, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
> End of the day, it's easy for a computer to read "0-2" and "0 to 2" and
> "0,1,2" and "0;1;2" as all the same,
they are not the same. 0-2 could also be the same as 0;1A;1B;2
Cheers Martin
_
sent from a phone
> On 20. Aug 2019, at 00:54, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>
> Is there a ISCED level 1A?
maybe not, or not currently (they could introduce them at some point), what I
wanted to say is that you need to know all possible values to make sense of a
range, while you need no knowledg
sent from a phone
> On 20. Aug 2019, at 12:48, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Other
> countries may do it differently, but here public footpaths are marked and
> even local walking
> clubs don't use routes which are not public footpaths unless the landowner
> has given
> explicit permission (in which
sent from a phone
> On 20. Aug 2019, at 16:53, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Most farmland is fenced off, for one reason
> or another (to stop livestock wandering off or to stop idiots wandering in).
it is country (or even region) specific, in Germany no, in (central) Italy
fences are common, but I
sent from a phone
> On 22. Aug 2019, at 00:01, Rob Savoye wrote:
>
> Yeah, I'd add this to a 'tourism=camp_pitch' node. Where I was
> yesterday works out to something like 'amenity=bbq;bear_box;parking'
> plus 'leisure=firepit'.
a more common mapping method would be individual objects for e
sent from a phone
> On 22. Aug 2019, at 01:37, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> OK, so there were 2 people in favor of capacity:tents=
I would prefer this. Although I would expect you could always add another tent
somehow. Or is this about legal regulations (e.g. to protect a vulnerable site,
sent from a phone
> On 22. Aug 2019, at 14:07, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
> In British English the term used is Cashback.
in Germany cashback is the name of a bonus program where you can get some money
for sharing your personal data with the merchant when you buy something. It
would be deeply
sent from a phone
> On 22. Aug 2019, at 18:52, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
> You can usually walk into a hairdressers to make an appointment and if
> they are not busy they will not turn you away.
>
> Its just those with an appointment will get priority. Much like making
> reservations in
sent from a phone
> On 25. Aug 2019, at 07:20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Type 'phone' into the OSMwiki search box and you get redirected to the key
> 'phone=*'.
> This gets preferential treatment to the key 'contact:phone=*'.
seems fair that “key:phone” shows up first for a se
sent from a phone
> On 26. Aug 2019, at 01:11, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> To me dune is a land form.
+1, for me these should go under natural and not in landcover
Cheers Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
htt
sent from a phone
> On 26. Aug 2019, at 00:33, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> A bit messy, but how about
> amenity=parking_space + access=vehicle_charging_only
> car_charging=yes/no
> truck_charging=yes/no
> hgv_charging=yes/no
Is it really „parking“? Maybe we should introduce an amenity=cha
sent from a phone
> On 26. Aug 2019, at 13:54, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Third problem is that although the ones my local supermarket recently
> installed have
> signs (which,so far, are being completely ignored) saying they are only for
> charging,
> in other places (particularly as charging st
sent from a phone
> On 25. Aug 2019, at 18:06, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
> there are at least two possibilities:
>
>
> phone=
> phone:emergency=
> phone:staff=
>
> and:
>
> phone=
> emergency:phone=
> staff:phone=
>
> Neither of which requires "contact:"
exactly, I was about to reply the sa
sent from a phone
> On 25. Aug 2019, at 21:48, marc marc wrote:
>
> we need to switch all contact to key with contact: prefix
> (pro : a datauser is able to group them without havng to keep
> a hardcoded list of all key (phone, fax, email, web, social network )
> and update to list everytime
sent from a phone
> On 23. Aug 2019, at 09:07, Morten Lange wrote:
>
> Could you/someone explain how you can search for objects that form such
> spatial relationships?
I’m not sure how to do it with publicly available services, but if I’m not
misguided, overpass api allows you to do it.
T
Am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019 um 00:19 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <
joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>:
> While some have suggested that uses of the landuse=* key like
> landuse=grass, landuse=village_green and landuse=recreation_area lead
> to misuse of the landuse=* key, the landcover=* key appears to be eve
Am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019 um 06:09 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <
joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>:
> All approved and de facto landforms in Map Features are under
> natural=*, eg natural=ridge, natural=valley, natural=cliff,
> natural=valley, natural=peak, natural=mountain_range... - it's one of
> the mai
sent from a phone
> On 27. Aug 2019, at 12:06, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> There are
> problems with landcover=hedge
yes, for me landcover is about the surface of the land, either about the plants
growing there, or about the bare surface like sand or rock. Hedge is a
functional description, a he
sent from a phone
> On 27. Aug 2019, at 23:00, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Oh, and you say that a sty is for pigs (correct) and a sty is for cows
> (incorrect)
probably just a copy +paste problem, and should have been cowshed
>
> Introduce a new value for building that means "building for liv
sent from a phone
> On 28. Aug 2019, at 13:26, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> If he were to propose some other value (I can't think of one) for a generic
> livestock-holding
> building then I would have less reason to object to the proposal. But I
> probably would still
> object - we have 24,000 sta
sent from a phone
> On 28. Aug 2019, at 14:40, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> According to google translate, it's "pig flats," but I suspect it's being
> literal rather
> than giving the equivalent English term. I'd probably map it as
> building=piggery +
> levels=n.
maybe there isn’t an English
sent from a phone
> On 29. Aug 2019, at 00:34, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> The preferences range from free-range chickens
> https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&biw=1242&bih=603&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=dv1mXaqGAY6UvQSrmrHoBA&q=free+range+chicken+farm&oq=free+range+chicken&gs_l=img.3.1.0l10.74
Am Fr., 30. Aug. 2019 um 14:25 Uhr schrieb Rory McCann :
> I think it's just a misspelling. I'm a native english speaker and I had
> to check which is the correct spelling (“sculptor” FTR 😉). I suspect
> that's what's happened here.
I have to admit I couldn't resist and fixed the spelling some
many years ago we were discussing meadow_orchard actually. I agree with
Christoph that there is room for a secondary landuse tag like landuse:secondary
it could otherwise be a subtag for forests, like
landuse=forest
forest=dehesa
or forest=agroforestry
agroforestry=dehesa
I would not renounce f
sent from a phone
> On 1. Sep 2019, at 14:05, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>
> since they are based on
> calculations of the floodplain geometry and historical observations of
> floods over many decades
indeed, and with a changing ecosystem (warming) statistical predictions will
also be less rel
sent from a phone
> On 2. Sep 2019, at 15:14, Vadim Shlyakhov wrote:
>
> There is no currently a standard way to tag an outdoor location
> (probably designated) where people can practice sunbathing.
sunbathing is exposing your skin to the sun, AFAIK it doesn’t require special
equipment or a
Am Di., 3. Sept. 2019 um 17:22 Uhr schrieb Diego Cruz :
> How about landuse=mixed_rural? Would that be useful to areas you know
> about?
>
no, it would not allow to tell anything and would be completely unclear.
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
you might want to refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nudism as
suitable combination.
Cheers Martin ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
sent from a phone
> On 4. Sep 2019, at 09:08, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> man_made=geoglyph (usage >700 in taginfo)
> Seems to be a reasonable tagging
+1
Cheers Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.
It could make sense in this context to mention the tag
historic:civilization
which is about the culture that created a feature.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic:civilization
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.o
sent from a phone
> On 4. Sep 2019, at 21:00, Sven Geggus wrote:
>
> Is there a difference between a greywater_drain and a
> sanitary_dump_station?
greywater is wastewater without feces, e.g. from sinks and showers, while I
would guess that a sanitary dump station is for sewage.
Cheers Ma
sent from a phone
> On 4. Sep 2019, at 23:45, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> But would that really apply to these, as most of them only range in age from
> <100 to 200-300 years old?
as long as you find a suitable value ;-)
In general the civilization tags aim more at older sites while for
sent from a phone
> On 5. Sep 2019, at 07:18, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>
> Should amenity=music_school be in map features?
IMHO the term is not clear, speaking of Germany, we need at least 3 types of
significantly different objects, which might be eventually be called music
schools:
1. “
801 - 900 of 6546 matches
Mail list logo
