Hi all,
Because we were having *so* much fun repeating the footway-cycleway-path debate
again, here's another related question: what does bicycle=no actually mean, no
bicycles or no cycling?
Last night I asked on IRC whether anyone know how to tag a "Cyclists must
dismount" sign, and would bic
On 03/12/2009, at 8:06 PM, Richard Mann wrote:
> On public land you can usually push a bike and be treated as a pedestrian,
> but that's not always the case on private land (eg the University Parks in
> Oxford) - bicycles are banned altogether.
Most of the time when I've seen those signs it has
On 05/12/2009, at 4:14 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Matthias Julius wrote:
> I guess it is implied that when you are not allowed to carry a bike
> you are not allowed to ride it neither.
>
> True, but when I tag bicycle=no, I don't intend to imply anything about
> wheth
On 06/12/2009, at 5:17 PM, John Smith wrote:
> 2009/12/6 James Livingston :
>> I'd hope that bicycle=no would have the same implications for having a
>> bicycle without riding it as other *=no tags would for their transports. For
>> example I would guess that where h
On 09/12/2009, at 3:30 AM, Mike Harris wrote:
> Personally - and I'm probably wrong! - I had always thought that foot /
> bicycle = yes / no etc. did not say anything one way or the other about
> formal legal status (hence leaving this to designation= ) but merely whether
> the evidence on the
On 11/12/2009, at 5:44 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> The current wiki definition of highway=cycleway is "mainly or
> exclusively for bicycles". This I cannot be sure of from the aerial
> imagery, nor can I of anything to do with the law. What to do...
Ah, the curse of NearMap being too good.
The curre
On 12/12/2009, at 7:47 AM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:02 PM, James Livingston wrote:
>>
>> The current solution I've seen near Brisbane is "do whatever you prefer",
>> which is why several paths flip back and forwards between footway and
On 20/01/2010, at 6:44 PM, Peter Childs wrote:
> Cafe, Bar, Pub etc.
>
> The line is weather it sells Beer, or other Alcoholic Beverages,
As another data point, here's what I define them as in Australia - not
guaranteed to be the same as other .au definitions:
Restaurant - Place to go and get a
On 28/07/2010, at 1:13 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I think that there is definitely space for a bridge-relation to deal with all
> these informations and bring them together. An alternative might be to
> draw an (additional) polygon for the bridge area in projection (with
> common nodes on the
On 31/07/2010, at 11:07 AM, John Smith wrote:
> Maybe we should stop using words for key pair values and just come up
> with a database that issues ID numbers, half the problems with the
> current scheme is due to people treating enumerated key pairs in the
> same way they are used to using english
On 17/08/2010, at 2:09 AM, Matthias Meißer wrote:
> Yes soft moderation by the community but therefore the community needs some
> central space and some guidelines. You already see the lack of voters, just
> cause it's to decentral communication atm.
It's also because some people (myself include
On 16/09/2010, at 6:57 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> It does seem, however, that it would seem to make more sense to either have
> separate nodes for each of the possible directions, or have some other way of
> signifying which direction or directions the stop sign applies to.
There's five or te
12 matches
Mail list logo
