There is data, what is measured.
With RTK GNSS, there is 1cm accuracy possible.
Should we tag this mapped data, so that we know the accurancy level of this
data?
Greetings Allroads.___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https
Thanks for the accuracy link
“you should mark the approximate accuracy of the given measurement as returned
by the instrument in the given instant.”
That is also better.
It is just, that you get a hint, source, accuracy, that the data is measured
in. Before you drag a node.___
There lots of forest roads/path, where the bicycle/pushed carried is
prohibited. Mostly, private owned land with a access_sign.
“the bicycle” “transportation vehicle” is prohibited.
Because, navigation programs do not us bicycle=no, as a hard no, there is the
need for a extra value.
bicycle=expl
https://images.mapillary.com/yQWkL-XX5eRN5A2j0JkKIA/thumb-2048.jpg
Geen toegang:
- met (brom)fietsen.
No access:
- with bicycles.
This is written, grammatically and orthographly, in a way, that the "vehicle"
is meant.
explicit the bicycle no access.
This is privat land, Staatsbosbeheer, owned
It is annoying for me too.
A router discussion.
https://github.com/abrensch/brouter/issues/79
Talk about a situation the use of use_sidepath and dismount. And the
bicycle=no, which is not a hard no.
Some qoutes.
“Hm, but in very most cases, bicycle=no is used effectively in sense of
bicycle=dism
The image are traffic_signs, described in traffic law. Traffic_signs must have
set dimensions.
There is also property access rules mentioned in law. Art. 461 in Wetboek van
Strafrecht.
The owner can express by sign with text, images, sometimes they use familiar
images. Like here.
“Hij die, z
https://images.mapillary.com/8ErC5D9pxN0AzAJ8YVrEAw/thumb-2048.jpg
with extra text, for pushing carry a bicycle.
"fietsen meenemen niet toegestaan"
"not allowed to bring bicycles"
This is a privat acces_sign, guaranteed by access law, expressed by “access in
an apparently way for him is prohibit
Could be a groundy path go over in a bridge=boardwalk, change material, change
fixation to a pier, a pier could also be floating.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3Dboardwalk
From: Paul Allen
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 10:09 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Sub
It is important to mention the website with the embedded stream.
But also the stream itself for direct use.
url:m3u8=*
Sometimes multiple different extension streams are available for different kind
off devices.
Such as radio stations with a webcam stream.
Live streams.
Image streams with from
The two methods:
1. Tagging on the way line. When a road, highway=*
2. Tagging a polygon. When a road, area:highway=*
Will always be used next to each other. We have to take that into account.
New mappers, see a parking plot/space and want to draw that in, that is
logical behaviour. It is obvi
For me, the value "parking_space" what key, single space problem must
be fixed first to say something about "street_side". As it comes to a
vote.
Could you elaborate?
amenity=parking_space can be used as usual within amenity=parking. This
of course also works with amenity=parking/parking=s
All landuse what is used for legally public roads, laid down in a zoning
plan by the Government "bestemmingsplan" should be called landuse=highway
no, because the content of a bestemmingsplan is what is politically desired
and legally permitted, it is a plan. Landuse is not about the zoning pla
Toponym key
Used at a import.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/3dShapes/Landuse_import
Translation:
Toponyms are used to still be able to apply a name = * to a large area, even if
this has been divided into tens to hundreds of small pieces due to the import.
The existing AND polygons with a nam
ink about it.
https://github.com/abrensch/brouter/issues/79
We need a hard and strict no.
I need to express the access, so that routers do not use no as a dismount.
I know it is the routers choice. But I want no bicycles there when i set a
tag.
People use also:
bicycle=privat, what is
Their are Government rules and landowner rules.
These landowner rules are mostly expressed on the border of their land with a
access_sign > access_sign rules
>“typically not traffic rules but additional”
equally important
In the rural, their lots of these access_signs.
Mostly wr
All waylines inside a area:highway=footway footway=sidewalk is a
highway=footway footway=sidewalk
When there is a connection to the road, inside the area:highway=footway,
footwalk=sidewalk is till the barrier=kerb.
Only on the road from barrier=kerb till the centerline of the road (wayline)
co
When there should be a footway=link
then there should also be a
path=link
cycleway=link
This is then a new method to tag a virtual T connection on the road.
This must be well thought out.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists
, ending up in saying
service=crossing
In the Netherlands we have the privilege, to use Goverment data, license agreed
with OSM.
(Site under construction) Sitemap with layers where we have a agreement on.
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~allroads/NLOSMOK/OSMOKNL/OSMOKNL.html
Zoom in, then check
out. How to use *=connection or else.
Allroads
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.op
I worked out a visualisation image.
>From the situation I linked in my earlier post.
https://i.postimg.cc/jqJSxT1w/service-crosssing-text.png
Allroads.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Was just a example, to make my situation description, more understandable.
First drawn al the polygons, area:highway, then all what is inside this polygon.
Kerb as a polygon, because it is a polygon, so a polygon.
The more advanced mapping. People can choose.
If they do we must think about, that h
)
=== road
||
||
||
If we think about it further, where more does this tag fit?
Allroads
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
ootway=sidewalk, when you could
draw the polygon area:highway=footway footway=sidewalk, this is inside the
polygon, equivalent value. So =sidewalk.
Allroads.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
https://i.postimg.cc/J41D2GSJ/pedestriansquare.jpg
[6]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/416303537
I made a mistake. i thought it was a pedestrian square, but it is a
livingstreet, so a T connection from steps to middle livingstreet
carriageway.
This need a *=connection value tag.
https:/
https://i.postimg.cc/c43VzBtk/squarelivingstreet.jpg
Took the wrong link.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Together with the introduction of the new tag, would it also be possible to
have a new access category tag that contains all singe-tracked motorized
vehicles?
The hierarchy in access is important, very important for routing. (their
scripts). Changing, hierarchy have a major impact!!
The hiera
on area:highway=unclassified, the part inside the
polygon, highway=track track=crossing crossing=unmarked.
This is what I mean find the balance of using a value, where it is more
appropriate, our decision have something to do with how we feel about the
hierarchy.
Allroads
___
>it really depends. I guess we agree that the meaning of tags in OSM is based
>on their common usage, so motorcar=yes means an automobile (i.e. not including
>for example busses or trucks), while motorcar=no means any multi-tracked
>motorized vehicle is excluded (implies hgv=no, tourist_bus=no,
nded up to make a style, to see and control the tags. Get hints in Josm
window.
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~allroads/JOSM/Styles/Road_extended_JOSM_style_info.html
Far from ready. Under construction. I must totally rewrite it, because of new
insights, new wishes, things are not possible in ma
As I wrote earlier:
>>So I must make a icon for speedpedelec, for use my style.
>>This is needed because, government write speedpedelec with text on
>>traffic_sign (undersigns). Even estate owners could make signs with
>>..
At the bottom of the diagram speed_pedelec is needed, because
sland=yes
Allroads
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
This is a question only about how to choose a new keyname.
Is it possible to use a partial abbriviation?
For example:
There is motor_vehicle, with one underscore.
to express a categrory with a more then one track or more then 2 wheels.
We can choose for:
multi_tracked_motor_vehicle, with 3 under
+1 landcover
+1 on a hierarchy index and a well and a thoughtful methodology.
landuse, should describe more the use of the land.
For example:
A road, this include the footway, cycleway, the verge, the barriers,
traffic_islands, the trees.
The verge, that is a part of the use, landuse=highway, t
For me it is highway=platform, ID, is doing it wrong.
In a discussion, I drawn out a visualisation.
https://i.postimg.cc/wxJcG6bH/bushaltehaltekominvulling1.png
Allroads.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https
A carriageway can have lanes or not.
A lane is a part of a carriageway with visual markings.
In Dutch law we have.
rijbaan = roadway = fahrbahn
and with visual marking, we have
rijstrook = lane = fahrstreifen
If there are no visual markings, there are no rijstroken / fahrstreifen /
lanes.
A tw
First, the consensus in OSM is, that only the tag key lanes=* is used, when
there is are visual markings for lanes.
Then the question is, are there lanes? Yes or no. How many?
lane_marking= no, we agreed (OSM), when no visual lanes there are no lanes,
lane_marking, it is referring to lanes, tha
).
Allroads.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
often this is 90 degrees on the
driving direction, or on other side of a T junction.
If the traffic_sign (first degree derivated) is not tagged it is almost
impossible to control tagging. With all combinations and undersigns.
Regards.
Allroads
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Marc Gemi
highway and
barriers in the road.
For control/check reasons, better to see a icon then watch the written key,
get the hint, that's why we make maps, make it more understandable.
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~allroads/JOSM/Styles/Road_extended_JOSM_style_info.html
A key must have one meaning
https://github.com/opening-hours/opening_hours.js/issues/270
Thinking loud, I like a set of subcategories.
Basic set for a year, others for the fast change.
I find this a practical understandable solution.
From: OSMDoudou
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 5:22 PM
To: 'Tag discussion, strategy and
=uncontrolled
crossing:island=yes
The last 3 tags could be retrieved from the way!
The other parts, where you do not walk/ride/drive.
area:highway=traffic_island for the areas.
On the polygon way barrier=kerb with no area=yes ( this should mean that
the whole island is a kerb, it is not).
Greetings
Allroads
41 matches
Mail list logo
