On 26.09.22 02:21 Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
But what can be done in cases where there is no real incline but
path goes through series of up and down hops?
I would intuitively prefer if you put the information about the presence
of "hops" into a specialized tag instead of making the value space
26 wrz 2022, 09:02 od o...@tobias-knerr.de:
> On 26.09.22 02:21 Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
>> But what can be done in cases where there is no real incline but
>> path goes through series of up and down hops?
>>
>
> I would intuitively prefer if you put the information about the presence of
> "
Still, splitting into 60 segments withinaccuracy greater than their lengthseems
to not be a good idea.
26 wrz 2022, 07:09 od y...@mailbox.org:
> You can't really micromap until you micromap for real ;-)
> More seriously, there may be no need to split ways down to the *exact* meter
> to give the
Any good cycling router needs to use a digital elevation model in it's
algorithm, or use elevation tied to the paths somehow (such as with a
gpx track). These odd OSM tags are a sideshow.
On 9/26/22 03:16, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
26 wrz 2022, 09:02 od o...@tobias-knerr.de:
To me, it seems that the root of the problem is that the
mtb:scale:uphill=* key is flawed.
Instead, these keys should be name mtb:scale:forward=* and
mtb:scale:backward=* . This would make everything unambiguous.
And, of course, an additional incline=up/down would be optional but very
helpfu
Training centers (reactivated proposal).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/training
Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Though note that for areas without very good DEM this tags may still provide
useful
info on short section of way.
There is a difference between gradual drop with a
normal slope and case where you have bunch of 10 cm high cliffs/kerbs -
especially
when going uphill.
Or 2m long section which is s
Probably worth mentioning how places which are officially classified
as schools and part of school system would be affected.
What about for example
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dmusic_school
?
What about universities where future sailors/pilots are training
(often these are mi
Thank you Alan for the insightful comment. The scrambles I have in
mind require little to no generalization step. This is the concept
that I was missing to understand some previous comments.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://list
Nearly two weeks passed since the RfC started. Quite some changes have
happened. I’d like to invite a second reading, to help weed out
remaining problems.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway=scramble
Please comment in the medium of your choice.
Thank you in advance
On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 02:10, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> What about universities where future sailors/pilots are training
> (often these are military schools).
>
They should then be under military=base + base_function=training
Thanks
Graeme
__
Maybe also amenity=university, but this out of scope of this proposal.
вт, 27 сент. 2022 г., 1:27 Graeme Fitzpatrick :
>
> On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 02:10, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
> tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> What about universities where future sailors/pilots are training
>>
Many retailers let you order online and pick up what you ordered at a
store (this is often called click and collect). However such retailers
also often provide dedicated pick up points — these are not stores — you
cannot buy anything there, you can only pick up products there that you
previousl
Dear all,
stevea wrote Mon Sep 26 2022 01:36:26 GMT+0200
Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination?
while the EN wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
does not explicitly exclude it [...] the DE wiki page >>
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tra
On Sep 26, 2022, at 5:14 PM, Georg wrote:
> Dear all,
> stevea wrote Mon Sep 26 2022 01:36:26 GMT+0200
>
Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination?
>>>
>>> while the EN wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
>>> does not explicitly exclude it [...] the D
Dear all,
Hungerburg wrote Mon Sep 26 2022 22:19:03 GMT+0200
Nearly two weeks passed since the RfC started. Quite some changes have
happened. I’d like to invite a second reading, to help weed out
remaining problems.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway=scramble
"use
Where there is a crossing with traffic islands, but the highways forming
the crossings and crossing the islands are mapped separately, my
assumption has been that crossing:island=no is the correct tagging.
If a visually impaired user is being told to expect additional islands
or refuges where
17 matches
Mail list logo
