Any good cycling router needs to use a digital elevation model in it's
algorithm, or use elevation tied to the paths somehow (such as with a
gpx track). These odd OSM tags are a sideshow.
On 9/26/22 03:16, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
26 wrz 2022, 09:02 od o...@tobias-knerr.de:
On 26.09.22 02:21 Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
But what can be done in cases where there is no real incline but
path goes through series of up and down hops?
I would intuitively prefer if you put the information about the
presence of "hops" into a specialized tag instead of making the
value space of an established and approved key more messy.
Leave incline=* to describe the overall incline of the way in that
case. That is: Do you end up lower or higher than you were in the
start?
In this case I am thinking about something
that overall has tiny elevation change.
What would you propose as such extra tag?
up_and_down=yes
(not really happy about it, but right now I
have no better idea)?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
