How is this access preference indicated?
(If it's by speed, I wouldn't be allowed even when running... yesterday I
barely managed 6,7 Kmph on a trail run).
Best, Peter Elderson
Op vr 1 mei 2020 om 22:38 schreef Mike Thompson :
> Hello,
>
> We have a trail [0] around here where walking/hiking i
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/food_sharing
A shelf/box/fridge where people drop off and pick up food in the sense of free
sharing and/or to reduce food waste.
Hi
I have made some changes in the proposal of amenity=food_sharing to give more
clarity about what you can expe
On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 1:02 AM Peter Elderson wrote:
>
> How is this access preference indicated?
There are signs that say something like "No Hiking, ... Mtn Bikes,
Horses, and Trail Runners Only"
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https
While I could agree with this, it isn't entirely unreasonable to have a
non-exact speed value if that's what's signed. Eg "walking speed" is often
used as a descriptor, and in this case we have "running". I found that there
was a unclear/rejected proposal a decade ago (if this diminishes its
releva
sent from a phone
> On 2. May 2020, at 17:15, Kovoschiz wrote:
>
> Eg "walking speed" is often
> used as a descriptor, and in this case we have "running".
walking speed is still a prescription for vehicles only, it does not exclude
pedestrians from running.
Cheers Martin
_
Hi there.
Following this topic, I would like to extend the discussion to the mail
list, because I think this is an important issue that should have a
broad solution.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=69011
Several months ago, I stumbled upon a problem which I found no solution
to.
Hi AntónioNormally I would add direction:forward or direction:backward
to a stop or give_way to indicate which direction it applies in.
Where speed limits are different you can use maxspeed:backward and
maxspeed:forward.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Sat, 2020-05-02 at 15:16 -0300, António Madeira wrote:
>
Phil, the question appears to be for different signs/rules for
different lanes/turns but in the same direction.
António, interesting question. In my interpretation, relation
type=enforcement seems to be intended for recording or punishing
violations of rules (wiki "devices that measure and documen
Às 15:36 de 02/05/2020, Philip Barnes escreveu:
Hi António
Normally I would add direction:forward or direction:backward to a stop
or give_way to indicate which direction it applies in.
Where speed limits are different you can use maxspeed:backward and
maxspeed:forward.
Phil (trigpoint)
Phil
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 16:21, António Madeira wrote:
> I'm not very knowledgable about relations, and I'm sorry if I'm a bit
> confused here, but doesn't a restriction relation means the exact opposite of
> what's intended here?
> I mean, I want to apply a STOP sign to a given lane (in a way with
For the first problem I have often used an approximate approach, in the
sense that if there were two different-level "give-ways" I would put the
more severe one, i.e. the stop.
In other cases I have created two ways taking the painted divider as a real
one.
For the second problem, I have simply ign
All,
Thanks for the suggestions and discussion. I have implemented
Martin's suggestion:
foot=no
foot:conditional = yes @ running
Mike
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
For a while myself and others have been using cycleway:lane=doorzone to say
the bicycle lane is in a doorzone, I've now added documentation of this as
"in use" at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:lane. However
this conflicts with the other "in use" cycleway:lane=exclusive/advisory,
13 matches
Mail list logo
