On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 16:21, António Madeira <antoniomade...@gmx.com> wrote: > I'm not very knowledgable about relations, and I'm sorry if I'm a bit > confused here, but doesn't a restriction relation means the exact opposite of > what's intended here? > I mean, I want to apply a STOP sign to a given lane (in a way with two lanes, > for example) and force its action to a given direction on the new road ahead.
IMO, a relation helps here because you can define the route which the rule applies to - it only applies going "from" a certain way and "to" a certain way, and specifically applies at a given "position". Then it is just a matter of choosing what type of relation works best, or creating a new type. > If neither relation scheme (enforcement or restriction) can be applied here > (for complexity or incompatibility reasons), why not use the existing lanes > scheme? > Like this: > > highway=stop > stop:lanes=yes|no > stop:turn:lanes=left Personally I've always seen highway=stop on a node, and I'm not sure :lanes tagging makes sense on a node (a point doesn't have lanes). You'd definitely need to add at least direction=forward/backward if tagging a node. But I wouldn't be opposed to that scheme in general. --Jarek _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
