I think they are at least close to the village, if not within it, in the
UK and Australia.
On 19/07/19 16:04, Peter Elderson wrote:
Hm.. village_common still says village, where often these areas are no
longer in a village.
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op vr 19 jul. 2019 om 00:42 schreef Warin <61s
I linked mentioned resources, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Awaterway%3Dsluice_gate&type=revision&diff=1879862&oldid=1879574
Anyone with experience in mapping such structures is welcomed to further
improve this page.
17 Jul 2019, 20:21 by fl.infosrese...@gmail.com:
>
17 Jul 2019, 15:05 by marc.ge...@gmail.com:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:30 PM Mateusz Konieczny
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I recently edited some of this pages (primarily mentioning that competing
>> tags
>> are used 50 to 50 000 times more often).
>>
>> I would welcome review of this pages (and edits
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 6:38 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think they are at least close to the village, if not within it, in the UK
> and Australia.
I'm not sure, but I think Peter is talking about the case where the
village has grown to be a city, or been engulfed as a suburb of a
But isn't the main characteristic of a village green / village common
that is is a rather large, open area ? I am thinking of a large grass
field in the centre of the town, but it could probably be paved as
well (or sand or ...)
OTOH The use of landcover=greenery is meant for "small" patches of
bu
I would say some indication of the purpose of the terrain should be
present. E.g. Power infra, lineage, a stage area, signs, lots of things can
indicate that the area is often used and/or dedicated to a variety of
events.
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op vr 19 jul. 2019 om 15:21 schreef Marc Gemis :
> B
To help with indicating questionable use of the tag, namely a green area within
(or very close to) a roundabout, I have created this overpass that you can run
in your own area.
It finds all landuse=village_green that is within 25 meters of a
junction=roundabout.
The example that is included in
Hi Jospeh
This proposal is an attempt to bring consistency in markers mapping, in two
ways :
- Provide a common concept to tag them all.
- Free pipeline=* from some features unrelated directly to pipeline
operation.
Second point should encourage a mapping good practice I didn't have in mind
in pr
That's way nicer, thanks Mateusz
Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 12:55, Mateusz Konieczny
a écrit :
> I linked mentioned resources, see
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Awaterway%3Dsluice_gate&type=revision&diff=1879862&oldid=1879574
>
> Anyone with experience in mapping such st
On 19/07/19 23:19, Marc Gemis wrote:
But isn't the main characteristic of a village green / village common
that is is a rather large, open area ?
Large? No. No requirement for 'large' whatever that may mean.
Open? Yes, in that people/animals can gather together but it could have trees
as peop
This week's weeklyOSM [1] included a suggestion to minimize the number
of fuel:* subkeys, which reminded me that the fuel tagging situation in
the United States is actually quite complicated. The same generic grade
of gasoline ("regular", "mid-grade", "premium") may have a different
octane rati
On 2019-07-19 17:24, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Compounding the matter, for several years, the fuel:* wiki page has
specified that octane ratings must be expressed in RON, which is used in
more countries. [3] In a few countries including U.S., octane ratings
are only posted in RON, not AKI.
This was
On Sat., 20 Jul. 2019, 10:26 Minh Nguyen,
wrote:
>
> Compounding the matter, for several years, the fuel:* wiki page has
> specified that octane ratings must be expressed in RON
That edit would appear to be an undiscussed edit by one mapper, I wouldn't
take it to be gospel. As you pointed out t
13 matches
Mail list logo
