I linked mentioned resources, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Awaterway%3Dsluice_gate&type=revision&diff=1879862&oldid=1879574
Anyone with experience in mapping such structures is welcomed to further improve this page. 17 Jul 2019, 20:21 by fl.infosrese...@gmail.com: > > Hi > > Le mer. 17 juil. 2019 à 15:07, Marc Gemis <> marc.ge...@gmail.com > <mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com>> > a écrit : > >> > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dsluice_gate >> > >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dsluice_gate> >> >> The person that added this page, is not happy with >> waterway=flow_control; flow_control=sluice_gate >> (discussion on Belgian Forum: >> >> https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66728 >> <https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66728>>> ) >> > > I'm sorry I can't be part of Ducth discussions. > Both waterway=flow_control + flow_control=sluice_gate and > waterway=sluice_gate aren't properly described on wiki and used respectively > about 500 and 250 times each. > A proposal remains about the first > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sluice_gate > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sluice_gate> > > As a reviewed key valve=gate exists, I'd be in favor of a third possibility : > waterway=valve + valve=gate > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:valve%3Dgate > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:valve%3Dgate>> (I know one of the > examples involves a sluice gate and described as pipeline=valve). > This would be consistent with pipeline=valve (equivalent of flow control > device) + valve=gate. > waterway=valve would be designed for every situation where pipeline=valve > isn't suitable (i.e when the duct isn't a pipeline, for free flow canals, > tunnels and so on...) > > All the best > > François >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
