Le 05. 08. 18 à 01:39, Warin a écrit :
> On 05/08/18 08:59, marc marc wrote:
>> Le 05. 08. 18 à 00:47, Andrew Harvey a écrit :
>>> What's the process to change the Status from "In use" to "Approved"?
>> write a propal, request for comment, call for voting
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Prop
Terminology does seem to vary around the world with apartment, flat, unit
all being interchangeable, I see the building:flats tag as the number of
self-contained residential units (where a unit has it's own front door,
kitchen, toilet (room) and bathroom).
I wouldn't recommend building:flats=1 on
sent from a phone
> On 5. Aug 2018, at 11:22, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
> Terminology does seem to vary around the world with apartment, flat, unit all
> being interchangeable,
maybe flat and apartment are interchangeable (could you call a 2-level
apartment a “flat”?) but unit is definitely
sent from a phone
> On 3. Aug 2018, at 18:03, Robert Szczepanek wrote:
>
> Indeed not all flood marks are really old/historic. But that threshold is
> probably very fuzzy.
I would put it like this: although they are not all old, they are all history
related (they show a historic flood leve
Le 05. 08. 18 à 11:22, Andrew Harvey a écrit :
> I wouldn't recommend building:flats=1 on a house, according to the wiki
> house is already "A single dwelling unit usually inhabited by one family."
"usually" as you said. somes houses host 2 units.
it's again the issue with missing "default values
Flood marks and high water marks are not necessarily the same thing.
Read
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_water_mark
to get the gist.
There are ordinary high water marks (and I suppose also the opposite,
ordinary low water marks) which are based on the regular tides in the area.
A flood mark wou
In my experience a nurse is not a mappable object. They will work in
(or out of) different health care facilities.
A nursing home is a specialist care home for residents that have
medical needs and they will have nurses to provide medical care for
those residents.
The district nurse, who will som
On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Philip Barnes wrote:
> In my experience a nurse is not a mappable object.
>
You win the internetz.
--
Paul
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Spotted thanks to Osmand:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2401935175
Yves
Le 5 août 2018 12:23:40 GMT+02:00, Volker Schmidt a écrit :
>Flood marks and high water marks are not necessarily the same thing.
>Read
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_water_mark
>to get the gist.
>There are ordinar
Here it is a doubt we have in Spanish Community. Some people are making
micromapping so we start to map the sidewalks and cycleways not as value
but as an independent way.
I know when you map a street wen can put most of the items as keys and
values.But when the items are mapped separately should
On 05.08.2018 17:16, yo paseopor wrote:
> So what is the correct way to map it: with name? or without name?
Adding name tags to separately mapped sidewalks is an attempt to fix
just one of the symptoms of a deeper problem: The lack of a
machine-readable link between the sidewalk way and the road i
The most common convention is to tag footways with a name only if it has
its own designated title, like a particularly famous path (and that is
often better on a relation).
I'm not totally sure if I'm understanding your question, but what are some
examples where you're unsure about the tags?
On
Could you clarity: Are you interested in the noun - 'a nurse' or verb -
'to nurse'?
There are many varieties of nurses & many establishments where people
are nursed:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility
DaveF
On 04/08/201
Oks I will show you:
http://bit.ly/2M2Ff6J > Cycle way with name , you can see the name of the
street when you are riding by it.
http://bit.ly/2M8VRK6 > sidewalk without name, you can see the order
without any indication of name (openroute use then the nearest, I think)
The question is with a sta
W dniu 05.08.2018 o 12:23, Volker Schmidt pisze:
Flood marks and high water marks are not necessarily the same thing.
Read
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_water_mark
to get the gist.
There are ordinary high water marks (and I suppose also the opposite,
ordinary low water marks) which are base
We have already a tag for footway/foot-cycle-ways/cycleways that indicates
that the way is a sidewalk/sidepath:
- footway=sidewalk for footpaths ( 881747 in taginfo)
- path=sidewalk (1090 in taginfo) or path=sidepath (790 in taginfo) for
foot-cycle-ways
- cycleway=sidepath (2450 in ta
I would expect that there are countries where nurses dispense basic medical
care from a surgery-type of location.
On 5 August 2018 at 16:16, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Philip Barnes
> wrote:
>
>> In my experience a nurse is not a mappable object.
>>
>
> You win the inte
Hi
I've a shop which only repairs mobile phones.
I've tagged it as
shop=mobile_phone
mobile_phone:repair=yes
sales=no
Seems a bit contradictory. Is there a more direct tag?
Cheers
DaveF
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lis
Thanks for the examples!
I've run into this issue as well, many times, and it's like I said: the
'name' tag is meant to answer the question 'what is the name of this
thing?', sidewalks themselves usually don't have names, and the street name
isn't the name of the sidewalk.
We've been trying to fi
On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 19:17 +0200, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> I would expect that there are countries where nurses dispense basic
> medical care from a surgery-type of location.
>
They most certainly do, that happens in the UK.
But a nurse isn't a mappable object, the mappable object is the
doctors/
Hola
On Sun, 5 Aug 2018 at 18:44, yo paseopor wrote:
> Why the road is the only item I don't have any doubt to tag it with name= ?
> Why the road is more important than the sidewalk or the cycleway? What is
> more important : person, car or bike?
Because a sidewalk is a part of a road (like a
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 3:20 PM, François Lacombe
wrote:
>
> 2018-08-03 15:34 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen :
>
>
>> It is Brtish *layman's* English. It would be a good idea to check with
>> somebody who works in the industry. But I suspect
>> he or she will tell you it's an insulator. In British layma
Hi Tobias
Yes, sidewalk mapped as ways are problematical for routeing. In order
to not create islands in (residential) areas without marked crossings,
one has to map unmarked crossings. If there are lowered kerbs or if a
sidewalk is just interrupted by a perpendicular street, it seems okay
to map
I'm interested by the premise/local/office/room where a nurse work.
those 2 url doesn't help,
healthcare key on wiki doesn't have the word nurse on it.
social_facility is wrong for this case.
Le 05. 08. 18 à 17:56, Dave F a écrit :
> Could you clarity: Are you interested in the noun - 'a nurse' or
Le 05. 08. 18 à 20:39, Philip Barnes a écrit :
> On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 19:17 +0200, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>> I would expect that there are countries where nurses dispense basic
>> medical care from a surgery-type of location.
>
> But a nurse isn't a mappable object, the mappable object is the
> do
On 5 August 2018 at 19:22, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> Terminology does seem to vary around the world with apartment, flat, unit
> all being interchangeable, I see the building:flats tag as the number of
> self-contained residential units (where a unit has it's own front door,
> kitchen, toilet (room)
On 05.08.2018 19:52, Dave F wrote:
I've a shop which only repairs mobile phones.
I've tagged it as
shop=mobile_phone
mobile_phone:repair=yes
sales=no
I'd call that 'troll tagging', tagging a feature and telling in the subtag that it is not what the
primary tag says [1].
Why not following th
On 6 August 2018 at 02:48, Robert Szczepanek wrote:
> W dniu 05.08.2018 o 12:23, Volker Schmidt pisze:
>
>> Flood marks and high water marks are not necessarily the same thing.
>> Read
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_water_mark
>> to get the gist.
>> There are ordinary high water marks (and
> I would think a good start would be changing the wiki to make it
historic=flood_level, leaving any reference to high (or low) water to be a
waterways thing ie the high tide mark.
+1
Very sensible IMO.
On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 2:59 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
>
> On 6 August 2018 at 02:48, R
On 06/08/18 09:01, Dave Swarthout wrote:
> I would think a good start would be changing the wiki to make it
historic=flood_level, leaving any reference to high (or low) water to
be a waterways thing ie the high tide mark.
+1
Very sensible IMO.
Yes.
Complication .. a historic king tide combi
Hi,
I have been looking at the values used with the landuse key to try and
stop land covers becoming regarded as a legitimate use of the key landuse.
One strange value I came across was 'clearing'. No OSM wiki document.
I resolved this to mean a change in land cover usually from trees to a
'
> "Own front door" to the street, or onto the corridor ie one front door
servicing multiple "units"?
Own front door to your unit, I think.
> Isn't this tag doing the same as rooms: under the hotel tag?
Yes.
Actually https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dapartment
recommends "number_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Last year I made a feature proposal[0] last year regarding evacuation routes.
There were a couple of recommended changes to the RFC[1] and while I agreed
with them I 1) failed to make them and 2) got side tracked on a couple of other
initiatives.
> This mirrors the associatedStreet approaches taken by different OSM
communities regarding addresses: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:
addr vs https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet. Most
of the same pros/cons apply, though with sidewalks there is a lot more
informat
I'd think this should be a relation - not a way.
At the moment the proposals says it is only a way.
And it might be better to place it directly in the emergency key?
Say emergency=evacuation_route??? Humm emergency says it is not for relations.
Arr well.
Rendering... yes .. a rendering for emer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 6, 2018 12:30 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd think this should be a relation - not a way.
> At the moment the proposals says it is only a way.
>
> And it might be better to place it directly
On 06/08/18 15:27, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 6, 2018 12:30 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'd think this should be a relation - not a way.
At the moment the proposals says it is only a way.
A
One thing that concerns me a little bit with marking evacuation routes is
what happens if the normal route is changed for "this" emergency? - you
usually drive North to reach here, but this time, due to unusual
circumstances, we need you to drive West towards there.
Or am I being *too* paranoid? :
On 06/08/18 16:10, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
One thing that concerns me a little bit with marking evacuation routes
is what happens if the normal route is changed for "this" emergency? -
you usually drive North to reach here, but this time, due to unusual
circumstances, we need you to drive Wes
39 matches
Mail list logo
