Spotted thanks to Osmand: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2401935175 Yves
Le 5 août 2018 12:23:40 GMT+02:00, Volker Schmidt <[email protected]> a écrit : >Flood marks and high water marks are not necessarily the same thing. >Read >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_water_mark >to get the gist. >There are ordinary high water marks (and I suppose also the opposite, >ordinary low water marks) which are based on the regular tides in the >area. >A flood mark would be a marker for the water level reached in certain, >particular events. >I am not sure about terminology in different jurisdictions, but the >concept >seems to be clear to me that there are two different things we want to >tag. > > >On 5 August 2018 at 11:46, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> >> >> sent from a phone >> >> > On 3. Aug 2018, at 18:03, Robert Szczepanek <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Indeed not all flood marks are really old/historic. But that >threshold >> is probably very fuzzy. >> >> >> I would put it like this: although they are not all old, they are all >> history related (they show a historic flood level) >> >> >> Cheers , Martin >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
