Hi Paul,
2018-08-02 14:17 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen :
> Yeah, all you could do with that one is line_clamp=mixed. The
> down/up/down situation you could maybe handle as
> line_clamp=suspension;pin;suspension.
>
Good point. It would be pretty easy to describe complex configurations as
matrix. I've st
If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a suggested w
2018-08-02 23:56 GMT+02:00 Tom Hardy :
> I've experimented a bit with lane and road attributes as in
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505256201 and the adjoi
If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a suggested
way of tagging (in "Examples/Motorways") is using letter to indicate which
lane goes to where (when there is a transition). This could be used to
extent the width
Hi,
I noticed that there was a stalled feature proposal originally made by
malenki for winter service tagging, and I'd like to propose the same
myself amended with my proposals.
Currently tagging of winter service is mostly done by the tag
snowplowing=*, but that only covers one aspect of winter
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:58 AM, François Lacombe wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> 2018-08-02 14:17 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen :
>
>> Yeah, all you could do with that one is line_clamp=mixed. The
>> down/up/down situation you could maybe handle as
>> line_clamp=suspension;pin;suspension.
>>
>
> Good point. It wo
Hello !
What about a tagging method like this :
lanes=3
lane_2=forward_direction;left_turn
or
lanes=3
lane_2:direction=forward
lane_2:turn=left
instead of
lanes=3
lanes:forward=2
turn:lanes:forward=left|through
?
djakk
Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 13:13, Lionel Giard a écrit :
> If you
while this might work, why would you try to replace an established
tagging system ?
The tagging system turn:lanes:xxx is supported by several data
consumers (OsmAnd, maps.me, MagicEarth and probably others).
In many countries people worked on tagging all roads with this system
after a project set
I think it is less verbose.
There can be multiple ways to express something in osm, like in the Ruby
language ?
djakk
Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 16:21, Marc Gemis a écrit :
> while this might work, why would you try to replace an established
> tagging system ?
> The tagging system turn:lanes:xxx
On Friday, 3 August 2018 06:11:48 CDT Lionel Giard wrote:
> If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging (
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a suggested
> way of tagging (in "Examples/Motorways") is using letter to indicate which
> lane goes to where (wh
Am 03.08.2018 um 16:30 schrieb djakk djakk:
> I think it is less verbose.
>
That isn't necessarily a positive (just as in programming languages).
> There can be multiple ways to express something in osm, like in the
> Ruby language ?
>
While that is certainly the case in OSM, introducing altern
:-)
Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 17:07, Simon Poole a écrit :
>
>
> Am 03.08.2018 um 16:30 schrieb djakk djakk:
>
> I think it is less verbose.
>
> That isn't necessarily a positive (just as in programming languages).
>
>
> There can be multiple ways to express something in osm, like in the Ruby
> lang
W dniu 26.07.2018 o 12:29, Andrew Davidson pisze:
On 25/07/18 22:05, Robert Szczepanek wrote:
Question 2:
Which tagging convention should we follow:
a/ flood_mark=yes + historic=memorial + memorial:type=flood_mark
b/ historic=flood_mark + flood_mark:type=(plaque, painted, ...)
c/ historic=highw
W dniu 26.07.2018 o 12:43, Warin pisze:
Some flood marks carry a number of different heights from different
dates. Would be good to map those too.
We map them and split into several nodes at the same place:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4381386159
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4381386
On Friday, 3 August 2018 09:49:07 CDT you wrote:
> On Friday, 3 August 2018 06:11:48 CDT Lionel Giard wrote:
> > If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging (
> >
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a suggested
> > way of tagging (in "Examples/Motorway
> Also, I often see a center lane for left turns in both directions, as in
> https://ecn.t0.tiles.virtualearth.net/tiles/a0213330110033323031.jpeg?g=
6570
> That's next on my list. It's currently tagged as a two lane road just a
> bit west of the intersection I referred to earlier. Note the soli
On Friday, 3 August 2018 15:39:09 CDT Lionel Giard wrote:
> You can tag it with :
> lanes=3
> lanes:forward=1
> lanes:backward=2
> turn:lanes:backward=left|through
>
> and split the way where the two arrows are located, and inverse the tagging
> on the other segment (put the lanes:forward=2; lan
On 8/3/2018 5:31 PM, Tom Hardy wrote:
On Friday, 3 August 2018 15:39:09 CDT Lionel Giard wrote:
You can tag it with :
lanes=3
lanes:forward=1
lanes:backward=2
turn:lanes:backward=left|through
and split the way where the two arrows are located, and inverse the tagging
on the other segment (p
On Friday, 3 August 2018 16:35:21 CDT Jmapb wrote:
>
> (Sorry, did a private reply...) The accepted answer posted here:
>
> https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/64617/how-to-map-center-turn-lanes
>
> is simply:
>
[...]
Thanks!
--
Tom Hardy
___
On 29/07/18 20:56, Andy Townsend wrote:
What I've tended to do with clearings is:
o natural=wood for "here be trees", with leaf_type added.
o If there's a large "landuse=forest" area already and that
encompasses wood, clearings, ponds etc. (and there often is), leave
that as "landuse=forest"
We released iD v2.10.0 last week!
📝 OSM Notes
You can now create, comment on, and resolve OpenStreetMap notes from within iD!
This work was done as part of Thomas Hervey's 2018 Google Summer of Code
project, and you can read about it in his diary here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user
Hi,
The proposed feature "footwear decontamination stations" is open for voting:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/man_made%3Dfootwear_decontamination#Voting
A tag to indicate the presence of a footwear decontamination station for
hikers.
I have made a rough draft on the OSM wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landcover%3Dclearing#Proposal
Later.
On 04/08/18 09:43, Warin wrote:
On 29/07/18 20:56, Andy Townsend wrote:
What I've tended to do with clearings is:
o natural=wood for "here be trees", with leaf_type added.
o If
sent from a phone
> On 4. Aug 2018, at 01:43, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As this is not a 'landuse' but a landcover I think moving it to
> landcover=clearing would be a good first step.
-1, “clearing” is neither a landuse nor a landcover.
cheers,
Martin
___
23 matches
Mail list logo
