:-)

Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 17:07, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> a écrit :

>
>
> Am 03.08.2018 um 16:30 schrieb djakk djakk:
>
> I think it is less verbose.
>
> That isn't necessarily a positive (just as in programming languages).
>
>
> There can be multiple ways to express something in osm, like in the Ruby
> language ?
>
> While that is certainly the case in OSM, introducing alternative tagging
> just to make things difficult is likely not going to make anybody happy.
>
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> djakk
>
>
> Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 16:21, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> while this might work, why would you try to replace an established
>> tagging system ?
>> The tagging system turn:lanes:xxx is  supported by several data
>> consumers (OsmAnd, maps.me, MagicEarth and probably others).
>> In many countries people worked on tagging all roads with this system
>> after a project set up by the German community.
>>
>> m.
>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 4:10 PM djakk djakk <djakk.dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello !
>> >
>> > What about a tagging method like this :
>> >
>> > lanes=3
>> > lane_2=forward_direction;left_turn
>> >
>> >  or
>> >
>> > lanes=3
>> > lane_2:direction=forward
>> > lane_2:turn=left
>> >
>> >  instead of
>> >
>> > lanes=3
>> > lanes:forward=2
>> > turn:lanes:forward=left|through
>> >
>> >  ?
>> >
>> >
>> > djakk
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 13:13, Lionel Giard <lionel.gi...@gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>> >>
>> >> If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging (
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a
>> suggested way of tagging (in "Examples/Motorways") is using letter to
>> indicate which lane goes to where (when there is a transition). This could
>> be used to extent the width tagging for transition lane (where one lane
>> split to two (or conversely). There are already a lot of possibility to tag
>> detailed lanes, but we could indeed add the width in it !
>> >>
>> >> PS: sorry for the previous message, i miss-clicked.
>> >>
>> >> 2018-08-03 13:08 GMT+02:00 Lionel Giard <lionel.gi...@gmail.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>> If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging (
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a
>> suggested w
>> >>>
>> >>> 2018-08-02 23:56 GMT+02:00 Tom Hardy <rhardy...@gmail.com>:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I've experimented a bit with lane and road attributes as in
>> >>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505256201 and the adjoining
>> intersection.
>> >>>> No width, but number, function and placement of lanes.  For
>> placement, I
>> >>>> always selected the center of the throughway.  This allows renderers
>> that pay
>> >>>> no attention to lane attributes to render a straight line through an
>> >>>> intersection.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> JOSM's "Enhanced lane and road attributes" visualizer shows this
>> quite well.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Tom Hardy <rhardy...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> Tagging mailing list
>> >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Tagging mailing list
>> >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Tagging mailing list
>> > Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing 
> listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to