Re: [Tagging] shop=discount

I would not consider Lidl or Aldi to be discount shops in the UK. They are not really cheaper than the other supermarkets when you compare own brand products. Lidl in particular stocks some quite expensive luxury products that you will not find anywhere else, a whole Serano Ham and stand at Chri

Re: [Tagging] shop=shoe_repair

2018-06-25 21:29 GMT+02:00 Jmapb : > Pardon the self-reply, but actually, this might be a case where a > shop=shoe_repair could also be tagged craft=key_cutter. Don't see why not. > jmb > To me, "key_cutter" would not seem a "craft", I would see it as a service a shop can offer (e.g. copies_key

Re: [Tagging] How to tag bakery not selling bread or other bread-like products?

2018-06-27 0:26 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > I have around me a French bakery and a Bavarian bakery .. they do both > sell 'bread' but they are different .. I think cuisine fits perfectly. > use it for your bakeries, still it will not be the solution in this case, because these boo

Re: [Tagging] shop=shoe_repair

On 27/06/18 18:19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2018-06-25 21:29 GMT+02:00 Jmapb mailto:jm...@gmx.com>>: Pardon the self-reply, but actually, this might be a case where a shop=shoe_repair could also be tagged craft=key_cutter. Don't see why not. jmb To me, "key_cutter" would not

Re: [Tagging] shop=shoe_repair

2018-06-27 10:33 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > Unfortunately most 'locksmiths' simply sell locks and cut a few keys. > If you want a good locksmith here you have to look for a 'master > locksmith' .. these people can repair, modify locks of many discretions. > They also are police ver

[Tagging] tagging religion-based access

Is there some established way to tag religion-based access restrictions? For example in Morocco only Muslims may enter a typical mosque. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] tower:type=suspension

2018-06-26 0:19 GMT+02:00 François Lacombe : > As we see that tower:type is cluttered by power values here, it would be > great to move to a new key. > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:type > > The cluttering is real : a power tower can also be used as a communication > tower and we c

[Tagging] still_visible_on=* or maybe still_visible_in=?

Sometimes it makes sense to do not fully delete OSM elements representing completelydestroyed objects. For example, completely destroyed road should not be present in OSM, but it may make senseto keep destroyed:highway=service until it is not visible on various aerial images to avoid remappingit

Re: [Tagging] still_visible_on=* or maybe still_visible_in=?

Le 27. 06. 18 à 15:38, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > completely destroyed road should not be present in OSM, but > it may make sense > to keep destroyed:highway=service until it is not visible on various > aerial images to avoid remapping > it by armchair editors. > But I am unsure which version

Re: [Tagging] still_visible_on=* or maybe still_visible_in=?

2018-06-27 15:38 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny : > Sometimes it makes sense to do not fully delete OSM elements representing > completely > destroyed objects. > > For example, completely destroyed road should not be present in OSM, but > it may make sense > to keep destroyed:highway=service until it

Re: [Tagging] åååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååå

On 6/27/18 9:52 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2018-06-27 15:38 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny >: > > Sometimes it makes sense to do not fully delete OSM elements > representing completely > destroyed objects. > > For example, completely destroyed roa

[Tagging] tagging bicycle charging stations

I encountered public charging station for electric bicycles. How this should be tagged? Currently https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station recommends amenity=charging_stationbicycle=yesscooter=nocar=not

Re: [Tagging] tagging bicycle charging stations

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > I encountered public charging station for electric bicycles. > > How this should be tagged? > > Currently https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity% > 3Dcharging_station > recommends > > amenity=charging_station > bicycle=yes > sco

Re: [Tagging] still_visible_on=* or maybe still_visible_in=?

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > I decided to use still_visible_on=Bing rather than note="It is still visible > on Bing" as with second "note" should already encompass this: "A note is used to inform other mappers about non-obvious information about an element, the aut

Re: [Tagging] tagging bicycle charging stations

Le 27. 06. 18 à 16:28, Paul Allen a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >> I encountered public charging station for electric bicycles. did you upload the photo somewhere ? I never see a public charging station for bike. what kind of the plugs are available ? >

Re: [Tagging] shop=shoe_repair

On 6/27/2018 4:46 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: it depends how we see the "craft" tag. I would see it for professions that require some specific knowledge and "craft"/skills, not anybody doing any work would qualify for it. E.g. seasonal workers in the harvest or warehouseman or shoe polisher

Re: [Tagging] tower:type=suspension

Hi, 2018-06-27 14:36 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > tower:type is intended as the main reason for a tower, I believe. > I don't like this idea of "main". Which sounds main for someone can be secondary for anyone else. If I want to get all radio or telecom sites, I'm not supposed to ask for

Re: [Tagging] tagging bicycle charging stations

On 27.06.2018 17:39, marc marc wrote: Le 27. 06. 18 à 16:28, Paul Allen a écrit : On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: I encountered public charging station for electric bicycles. did you upload the photo somewhere ? https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ebike+pedelec+charging

Re: [Tagging] tagging bicycle charging stations

You don't need to include all the "no" values, I'd say. Just tag what you see (not what you don't see). amenity=charging_station charging:bicycle=yes On Wed, Jun 27, 2018, 20:39 Max wrote: > On 27.06.2018 17:39, marc marc wrote: > > Le 27. 06. 18 à 16:28, Paul Allen a écrit : > >> On Wed, Jun 2

Re: [Tagging] tower:type=suspension

sent from a phone > On 27. Jun 2018, at 18:20, François Lacombe wrote: > > My point isn't to totally get rid of tower:type, but to get line clamping out > of it and only focus on man_made=tower classification. it is not completely clear at this point which kind of towers are to be tagged w

Re: [Tagging] tagging bicycle charging stations

On 28 June 2018 at 04:38, Max wrote: > > but this will change soon as standardization happens. You mean like this: https://xkcd.com/927/? :-) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] still_visible_on= or maybe still_visible_in=

From subject [Tagging] still_visible_on=* or maybe still_visible_in=? On 27/06/18 23:55, Richard Welty wrote: On 6/27/18 9:52 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2018-06-27 15:38 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny mailto:matkoni...@tutanota.com>>: Sometimes it makes sense to do not fully delete OSM

Re: [Tagging] tagging bicycle charging stations

On 2018-06-27 16:28, Paul Allen wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Mateusz Konieczny mailto:matkoni...@tutanota.com>> wrote: I encountered public charging station for electric bicycles. How this should be tagged? Currently https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3