You don't need to include all the "no" values, I'd say. Just tag what you see (not what you don't see).
amenity=charging_station charging:bicycle=yes On Wed, Jun 27, 2018, 20:39 Max <abonneme...@revolwear.com> wrote: > On 27.06.2018 17:39, marc marc wrote: > > Le 27. 06. 18 à 16:28, Paul Allen a écrit : > >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >>> I encountered public charging station for electric bicycles. > > > > did you upload the photo somewhere ? > > > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ebike+pedelec+charging+station&t=canonical&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images > > There is currently a plenthora of different standards on electric > bicycles (some with identical plugs, but different polarity!), but this > will change soon as standardization happens. > http://www.energybus.org/Basics/What-is-EnergyBus > > > > I never see a public charging station for bike. > > what kind of the plugs are available ? > > > >> Should be charging:bicycle=yes, charging:car=no, > > > > that look like a good idea. > > > >>> I propose to use amenity=bicycle_changing_station > >>> (like there is amenity=bicycle_parking and amenity=parking). > > > > that's a bad idea since this would have the same issue as for parking > > with cycle and motorcycle : 2 overlapping values > > > > Regards, > > Marc > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
