Re: [Tagging] [OKFILTER] Re: Mapping generic sheds

sent from a phone > On 4. May 2018, at 22:48, Paul Allen wrote: > > If one or two people can fit inside, it's a shed. If you can fit a car in, > and the door is wide enough, it's > a garage. Bigger than that and it's a barn. Smaller than a shed and it's a > kennel. I like these defini

Re: [Tagging] Mapping generic sheds

@Steve Interesting fact that even within Oxford resources the definitions differ. 4 I also did a picture search for "barn" on google, and noticed that "barn" for the type of building is shared widely, but the usage has endless variation (stuff, cattle, crop, retail, storage, restaurants, culture),

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:spacing=*

Feature Proposal - RFC - key:spacing=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:spacing%3D* According to Proposal Process : - Please discuss each proposed feature on its own discussion page. Proposed feauture i

Re: [Tagging] [OKFILTER] Re: Mapping generic sheds

If it has a selling counter it's a kiosk? (*ducks behind sandbags*) :-) 2018-05-04 22:48 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen : > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Johnparis wrote: > >> I agree with you, Dave, about "shed roof", but I have very often >> seen/heard the term "shed" used regardless of the type of

Re: [Tagging] [OKFILTER] Re: Mapping generic sheds

On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Peter Elderson wrote: > If it has a selling counter it's a kiosk? (*ducks behind sandbags*) > :-) > Cry 'Havoc!', and let slip the ducks of war. (Why else would the ducks be behind sandbags?) :) -- Paul ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

sent from a phone > On 4. May 2018, at 22:34, Johnparis wrote: > > Please DO follow Thorsten's suggestion and follow PTv2, mapping the stops as > nodes alongside the street/way (not on it) in the proper direction. Tag each > one: > walking_bus=yes > public_transport=platform is walking rea

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

If there are actual poles and stop signs, you can only “board” at these places and at specific times, and the “driver” stays with the group from the first to the last stop, then yeah, I can see this as being very different from a “school crossing guard” which generally stays at one specific cros

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

We also have walking bus routes in Turkey but without drivers. We call them "tabanvay", foot tram. You can have very crowded walking bus routes in peak times, especially in pedestrian road networks. 05-05-2018 15:59 tarihinde osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au yazdı: > > If there are actual poles

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

Without a "driver", fixed "stops" and a defined schedule, that sounds more like what's currently already mapped using route=foot relations? > -Original Message- > From: Erkin Alp Güney > Sent: Saturday, 5 May 2018 23:28 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Pr

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

No, foot tram routes are unmarked but you can easily join one by following the crowd. Normal foot routes have guiding signs. 05-05-2018 17:05 tarihinde osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au yazdı: > Without a "driver", fixed "stops" and a defined schedule, that sounds more > like what's currently al

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

If they are unmarked on the ground, are they documented somewhere? Or is it simply a case of "this is a common route a lot of people walk during certain times as there is a strong flow of people from A to B and this is the most commonly used route"? (In which case they aren't really something t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

Not really transient and some routes can be over 500m in length. For example, in Karşıyaka, more than 100 people/min/sq-m walks following Bahriye Üçok Boulevard (western sidewalk only) and Kemalpaşa Avenue (pedestrianised during the day and evening, pedestrian priority otherwise, marked by a pedest

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (amenity=lounger)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/lounger A place for people to lie down. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:spacing=*

On Saturday 05 May 2018, Peter Elderson wrote: > [...] > > The key is proposed as part of a rendering proposal for > *natural=tree_row*, [...] > > However, the proposed usage is explicitly non-exact: [...] As a general rule a good tag or tagging proposal should be mapper oriented, it should be de

[Tagging] service:vehicle: prefix

Hi all, what is the service:vehicle: prefix good for, and where is it documented ? (1 223 occurrences) https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/service%3Avehicle%3Acar_repair#overview Cheers. Thilo ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org ht

Re: [Tagging] [OKFILTER] Re: Mapping generic sheds

On 5 May 2018 at 20:17, Peter Elderson wrote: > ducks behind sandbags > :-) > No, I a simple pile of sandbags wouldn't be enough to count as either a shed or a barn! :-) Thanks Graeme ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.o

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

Well, but based on your description, these are not planned routes in any way. They are purely transient emergent behaviour based on the fact that a lot of people want to move between these two points, and this is the obvious way to go. Take the people away, and the phenomenon disappears. This is

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:spacing=*

> -Original Message- > From: Christoph Hormann > Sent: Sunday, 6 May 2018 03:37 > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:spacing=* > > If i try to ignore the rendering related aspects of your proposal it > boils down to bein

Re: [Tagging] service:vehicle: prefix

As part of shop=car_repair https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcar_repair Thanks Graeme On 6 May 2018 at 09:51, Thilo Haug OSM wrote: > Hi all, > > what is the service:vehicle: prefix good for, > and where is it documented ? (1 223 occurrences) > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] service:vehicle: prefix

So ... no documentation. Nor discussion visible on the wiki. But follows the practice of service:bicycle:repair=yes which is poorly documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:repair On 06/05/18 13:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: As part of shop=car_repair https://w