Please notice that, for doing something similar to what you do here
(reading a lot of maps and aerial imaginery, being only one of them [3]
google maps) I was forced to erase my edition and do it again.
Just to warn you.
El 12/1/2018 8:30, "Jo" escribió:
> It definitely doesn't look like a publi
You are right in that we shouldn't base any of our mapping on what is
visible on Google Streetview. Which is why I was suggesting that somebody
go check it out locally. I've been looking at Belgian aerial imagery we are
allowed to use, taken over several years. But nothing useful can be seen on
the
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:05:09 +0100
"OSMDoudou" <19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote:
> How would you tag it ?
I also sometimes look through suspicious objects - and in cases like
this I sometimes
- open notes so local mappers are able to respond (now or in a future)
- ask in a ch
from aerial imagery and existing tag : landcover=gravel :)
Le 12. 01. 18 à 14:52, Jo a écrit :
> You are right in that we shouldn't base any of our mapping on what is
> visible on Google Streetview. Which is why I was suggesting that
> somebody go check it out locally. I've been looking at Belgi
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:14:31 +0100
Selfish Seahorse wrote:
> should I add a
> note to the wiki page of `amenity=drinking_water` that this tag is
> discouraged?
What tag you want to describe as discouraged? drinkable?
drinking_water?
___
Tagging mailin
On 12/01/2018 14:06, marc marc wrote:
from aerial imagery and existing tag : landcover=gravel :)
Which to be clear is a pretty rare tag -
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landcover=gravel - 431 uses
worldwide.
Best Regards,
Andy
___
Taggi
Hi!
"amenity=drinking_water works for me" it's ok for me too
amenity=drinking_water it is a very good, universal, proven and needed tag.
I wondered if it was possible to determine the quality of the water more
accurately. It looks like with drinking_water=yes/no/boil/ ... is an
indispensable tag, w
It should be
Someone can explain the reason for imports amenity=water_point
https://postimg.org/image/48ok5saed/ for example an increase in the amount
of the tag amenity=drinking_water https://postimg.org/image/f3607hgl1/ you
can see big differences http://taghistory.raifer.tech/.
Regards
Slavo
___
Otherwise. If the amenity=dringing_water tag is not suitable (the end user
can not see the code), it may be worth considering a global change to
amenity=water_point. If amenity=water_point is not suitable should be
deprecated. For me it does not matter if there is amenity=drinking_water or
amenity
Don't worry about local knowledge, I'm local mapper and will survey the place.
I found a dozen of similar or slightly different cases in the area, and the
problem is not about verify things, but about *what* to verify.
The goal of using street view images is not to map based on that, but to
dis
I sometimes use surface=* as a stand-alone tag for areas with an unclear
or uninteresting purpose. Doing so captures the physical reality on the
ground pretty well in my opinion.
From this point of view, the area in question is already tagged
correctly. Maybe we can find out what it's being used f
On 12-Jan-18 08:45 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 11. Jan 2018, at 22:14, Selfish Seahorse wrote:
In order to avoid repeating ourselves again in a year: should I add a
note to the wiki page of `amenity=drinking_water` that this tag is
discouraged?
I’m all for tagging
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 19:56:39 +0100
"OSMDoudou" <19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote:
> landuse=retail
landuse=retail should include also shop buildings (it include all area
used for retail, not areas used for retail purposes that were not
tagged using other tags)
On 13-Jan-18 05:07 AM, Cez jod wrote:
Hi!
"amenity=drinking_water works for me" it's ok for me too
amenity=drinking_water it is a very good, universal, proven and needed
tag.
I wondered if it was possible to determine the quality of the water
more accurately. It looks like with drinking_water=y
"The man_made=tap,drinking_fountain, well stand by themselves. They do
not need amenity=drinking_water, and suggesting that
amenity=drinking_water
should be included with them is wrong. Rendering of these man_made
tags is a separate issue and should not determine the tags used."
You've been curio
"Amenity= drinking_water is non specific. It does not tell me if I can
drink directly from it (I can from a man_made=drinking_fountain), fill a
water bottle without trouble (I can from a man_made=tag,
drinking_water=yes), fill a caravan water tank (I and from a
amenity=water_point) .. etc etc. Peop
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 06:46:55 +1100
Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The tag amenity=drinking_water is non specific, it could be a spring,
> a stream, a pool. I view it as similar to highway=road.
>
> The man_made=tap,drinking_fountain, well stand by themselves.
Are you aware that there are
"man made=drinking_fountain must have information if human can use this
water intake for health and legal reasons."
Upss. I mean amenity=fountain not man made=drinking_fountain
Regards
Slavo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://li
"man made=drinking_fountain must have information if human can use this
water intake for health and legal reasons."
Upss. I mean amenity=fountain not man made=drinking_fountain
Regards
Slavo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://li
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Cez jod wrote:
I think it would be worth adding a tag if the water is really harmful
hazard=poison (in the sense of water contaminated permanently, for example:
salt, heavy metals, radiation, chemicals)
I don't know if this is a language issue or some peculiarity
sent from a phone
> On 12. Jan 2018, at 22:30, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> And that
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Ddrinking_fountain is
> used only 36 times worldwide?
>
> Removing amenity=drinking_water and replacing it with
> man_made=water_tap or man_made=drinking_fo
"Note that "potable" doesn't mean drinking water, it means any liquid that
can be (reasonably) safely ingested, such as orange juice or beer."
That's right, but here we are talk about water, not all other
substances that contain it.
Small beer has not killed anyone yet(it is harmful after several
Everyone is focused on amenity=drinking water. I have a question for the
source tag amenity=water_point, waterway=water_point (waterway=fuel maybe
also should be?) Is all confusion about amenity=drinking_water and
amenity=water_point related to the grammar of english language?
Regards
Slavo
__
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Cez jod wrote:
Everyone is focused on amenity=drinking water. I have a question for the
> source tag amenity=water_point, waterway=water_point (waterway=fuel maybe
> also should be?) Is all confusion about amenity=drinking_water and
> amenity=water_point related
"I don't know if this is a language issue or some peculiarity of labelling
in your country"
I understand that you suggest a change amenity=drinking_water to
amenity=water_point I am very much in charge. In OSM, we map usage the
first tag in your country(not only yours) was amenity=drinking_water t
On 13-Jan-18 08:58 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 12. Jan 2018, at 22:30, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
And that
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Ddrinking_fountain is
used only 36 times worldwide?
The frequency of use is,in part, determined by how long it
On 13-Jan-18 09:20 AM, Cez jod wrote:
"Note that "potable" doesn't mean drinking water, it means any liquid that
can be (reasonably) safely ingested, such as orange juice or beer."
That's right, but here we are talk about water, not all other
substances that contain it. Small beer has not kille
On 13-Jan-18 10:42 AM, Cez jod wrote:
"I don't know if this is a language issue or some peculiarity of > labelling in
your country"
In some parts of the world the best quality water available is not safe
for drinking,
yet that is all that is available so people drink it rather than die
from t
I understand that tag amenity=drinking_water is a problem because it
complicates basic tagging water sources.
I understand that the amenity=water_point is repair method has
appeared. Why not try to fix basic tagging.
Current tagging goes into atomization, fragmentation.
Maybe in 10 years we will h
On 13-Jan-18 08:04 AM, Cez jod wrote:
"The man_made=tap,drinking_fountain, well stand by themselves. They do not need
amenity=drinking_water, and suggesting that amenity=drinking_water
should be included with them is wrong. Rendering of these man_made tags is a
separate issue and should not
In many man_made=drinking_fountain there is a smoll button or a small piece
of metal that opens the stream of water. Tap opened with a button, small
piece of metal or even motion detector.
In other points consent man_made=drinking_fountain it is only for drinking,
small amounts of water.
"I unders
Is there a consensus here?
> The tag amenity=drinking_water is non specific, it could be a spring, a
stream, a pool. I view it as similar to highway=road
Well said, amenity=drinking_water "a place to get drinking water" really
just means drinking_water=yes and access=yes. Both a common tap and a
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 10:44:10 +1100
Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As a person who added some of these amenity=drinking_water in the
> past I feel that changing the ones I have added a better tag of, say,
> man_made=drinking_fountain is justified ... that is what is
> specifically there.
>
On 2018-01-12 14:52, Jo wrote:
> You are right in that we shouldn't base any of our mapping on what is
> visible on Google Streetview. Which is why I was suggesting that
> somebody go check it out locally. I've been looking at Belgian aerial
> imagery we are allowed to use, taken over several years
34 matches
Mail list logo
