hello,
I know how to do a template in OSM wiki, but don't know how to do a
"proposed template"...
Is it possible ?
And if yes can somebody explain how to do ?
The idea would be to do a "proposed template" for various
possibililites of this key https://wiki.openstreetmap.o
Am 15.05.2017 um 14:46 schrieb John Willis:
This combination will vary, but:
"Tag" level - a business that does something else ( a convenience store, a
strawberry farm, a department store) that offers courier service in some manner. Be it
local delivery or international shipping.
"Retail" lev
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Zecke wrote:
> ...seems to be used often enough as a synonym for...
>
> ...people are talking about ... when they just mean...
>
>
Please, let's not go this way. Not for adits, not for anything. Terminology
exists for a reason and if you just go with whatever lay
sent from a phone
> On 16. May 2017, at 09:29, Tobias Wrede wrote:
>
> May I suggest to focus the proposal on the frontend for now? Let's find a
> proper tagging for the place a customer goes to drop of his parcel, mail his
> letter, buy his stamp, collect his poste restante, do his banking
sent from a phone
> On 16. May 2017, at 02:10, John Willis wrote:
>
> Courier:handles:automobiles=yes
I would use a different main tag for shipping trade and couriers. There's a lot
of shipping going on via cargo trains, ships (container, tanker, etc.), air
freight and trucks, as well as s
On 15/5/17 22:36, Tobias Wrede wrote:
The bigger concerns focused indeed
around how to reasonably differentiate and use a=post_office and
a/o=courier, especially in worlds where there is no clear
differentiation (any more).
I wouldn't have thought that this would be too hard to do. The Universa
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> For shops that offer courier services as a minor part / not primarily, it
> should be a property for the shop, maybe with the carrier in the key, e.g.
> amenity=fuel, courier:UPS=yes?
Maybe it's a silly idea, but why do not we map t
Just a reminder: today voting for the aeroway key redefinition is starting,
please vote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/include_spacecraft_in_aeroway
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.
2017-05-16 10:27 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis :
> Maybe it's a silly idea, but why do not we map this as 2 nodes ? This
> way, we do not have to come up with 2 sets of keys (one for
> amenity=courier and one on anything else).
> Both nodes could be connected via a "shop"-relation or whatever you
> want t
Am 16.05.2017 um 10:27 schrieb Marc Gemis:
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
For shops that offer courier services as a minor part / not primarily, it
should be a property for the shop, maybe with the carrier in the key, e.g.
amenity=fuel, courier:UPS=yes?
Maybe it
On 16-May-17 06:01 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 16. May 2017, at 09:29, Tobias Wrede wrote:
May I suggest to focus the proposal on the frontend for now? Let's find a
proper tagging for the place a customer goes to drop of his parcel, mail his
letter, buy his stamp, c
Hello all,
In my attempts to sort out some of the London Underground, here's rail
question 3, which is: Is my understanding of route_master -> superroute ->
route correct?
Example: The Central Line is organised like this:
- A1 -> B
- A2 -> B
- B-> C
- C -> D1
- C -> D2
- C -> D
Am 16.05.2017 um 12:20 schrieb Warin:
On 16-May-17 06:01 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
The tag in the first proposal wasn't chosen badly, it was insufficiently
defined. Office is not a good tag for the public facing frontend with counters
etc.
I disagree.
Shops frequently have counters etc
I would love it if we can map PT routes that way, some day.
Jo
Op 16 mei 2017 1:05 p.m. schreef "Bjoern Hassler" :
> Hello all,
>
> In my attempts to sort out some of the London Underground, here's rail
> question 3, which is: Is my understanding of route_master -> superroute ->
> route correct?
Hi Jo,
so there's weren't any others that expressed interest in a mapathon.
However, I'd be very happy for us to speak and exchage ideas?
Bjeorn
On 14 May 2017 at 14:35, Jo wrote:
> Hi Aun,
>
> Do you know about JOSM's public transport assistant plugin?
>
> Maybe we should set up a weekly onl
Hi all,
I'd be happy with a public transport hangout - it's a good idea.
Any other takes?
(We could adjust frequency and times based on demand.)
Bjoern
On 14 May 2017 at 14:35, Jo wrote:
> Hi Aun,
>
> Do you know about JOSM's public transport assistant plugin?
>
> Maybe we should set up a we
>
I would use amenity=courier for this, maybe a subtag which says something
about scope (local, regional, national, international) and about kind of
shipped goods (parcel, letters/documents, medicine, etc.).
The scope of area of service will be a very helpful subtag, may be we could
decide one whi
Javbw
> On May 16, 2017, at 4:29 PM, Tobias Wrede wrote:
>
> May I suggest to focus the proposal on the frontend for now?
The front end is the most difficult part, and having a proposal that covers the
chain and many permutations is important.
For example, I would _never_ go to a UPS sort
18 matches
Mail list logo
