Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-15 Thread Paul Johnson
Looks like bike-shedding the previous proposal without addressing the root problem. On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:48 AM, muzirian wrote: > The proposal for amenity=courier was rejected, so going on with another > suggestion office=courier. > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Office%3Dcourier >

Re: [Tagging] mandatory restriction with via way as members

2017-04-15 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Michael Tsang wrote: > Dear all, > > > > I have created a restriction (mandatory route) where if vehicles coming > from way must go through a section of a trunk route before leaving it. > Assume that an only_straight_on relation has been created with from A-C, >

Re: [Tagging] Quonset hut

2017-04-15 Thread Rene
I like to make an extra building key in the key:building wiki but I got a few questions: 1. Am I allowed to add such a key? 2. How does it work? I've never done this before so help is very much appreciated. 3. Maybe the most important question, which value is it gonna be? Quonset_hut, romney_h

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)

2017-04-15 Thread muzirian
>Would you clarify how to use "courier:brand=yes/office/subsidiary"? It was taken from a a suggestion on the other previos proposal, i will add more info on that. Kelvin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/l

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-15 Thread muzirian
I have been trying to address all the suggestions mentioned on the other problem, if you feel I missed something.Please feel to talk about it.It will help greatly if you can explain it in bit more detail or mention it on the talk page. Regards Kelvin On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Paul Johnson

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-15 Thread muzirian
Also looks like you have started another thread on the topic. On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 5:30 PM, muzirian wrote: > I have been trying to address all the suggestions mentioned on the other > problem, if you feel I missed something.Please feel to talk about it.It > will help greatly if you can expla

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-15 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:00 AM, muzirian wrote: > I have been trying to address all the suggestions mentioned on the other > problem, if you feel I missed something.Please feel to talk about it.It > will help greatly if you can explain it in bit more detail or mention it on > the talk page. > H

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-15 Thread muzirian
This has been addressed several times on the list for the previous proposal as well as on the main page and discuss page of previous proposal.And this same thing is mentioned on the last few mails of the main thread for this rfc,if you are following. I hope you are following,If not please check the

[Tagging] Platform screen doors and automatic platform gates

2017-04-15 Thread jc86035
There doesn't seem to be a way to tag platform screen doors and automatic platform gates right now. If they should be in OSM, should they be tagged as (e.g.) barrier=psd / barrier=apg, and should we have another tag for specifying the number of doors/gates? jc86035 ___

Re: [Tagging] Platform screen doors and automatic platform gates

2017-04-15 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sat, 2017-04-15 at 13:10 +, jc86035 wrote: > There doesn't seem to be a way to tag platform screen doors and > automatic platform gates right now. If they should be in OSM, should > they be tagged as (e.g.) barrier=psd / barrier=apg, and should we > have > another tag for specifying the numb

Re: [Tagging] Platform screen doors and automatic platform gates

2017-04-15 Thread jc86035
Platform screen doors (PSDs) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platform_screen_doors) are series of ceiling-height glass doors on the edges of rail platforms, usually in underground stations, which open and close with the doors of the train carriages. They separate the platform edge from the track and

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-15 Thread Marc Gemis
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > How is it not a post office that just happens to have an operator other than > the state? So if I ask you "where is the nearest post office?" , it is possible that you send me to a DHL office ? m

Re: [Tagging] Platform screen doors and automatic platform gates

2017-04-15 Thread Marc Gemis
there is this proposal for all kinds of doors: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Andreas.balzer/door-proposal-version2 On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 3:39 PM, jc86035 wrote: > Platform screen doors (PSDs) > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platform_screen_doors) are series of > ceiling-height glass

Re: [Tagging] Quonset hut

2017-04-15 Thread Dave Swarthout
There was a small photo of a quonset hut in Wikimedia already but I added mine to it. The photo is at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Quonset_hut_-_Adak_Island.jpg On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Rene wrote: > I like to make an extra building key in the key:building wiki but I got a >

Re: [Tagging] Platform screen doors and automatic platform gates

2017-04-15 Thread jc86035
I don't think that's going to work very well, since as the proposal for key:door is now every single door or gate on a platform would have to be tagged separately. This would be a bit difficult to map, and there might need to be a relation to specify that they all open and close at the same time. I

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-15 Thread Thilo Haug OSM
In Germany this is the same : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Post Am 15.04.2017 um 17:04 schrieb Marc Gemis: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: >> How is it not a post office that just happens to have an operator other than >> the state? > So if I ask you "where is th

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-15 Thread muzirian
Deutsche Post DHL Group still has different divisions. check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Post#Post.2C_ecommerce.2C_Parcel_division and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Post_(brand). I think they should come under post office tag. While DHL Express can be counted as courier servic

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-15 Thread muzirian
If made simple, Deutsche Post is the brand name for postal serives and DHL is the name for logistics/courier services from what I understand from the wiki. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-15 Thread Marc Gemis
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Thilo Haug OSM wrote: > In Germany this is the same : > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Post As I wrote before, it is not because something does not exists in one country, that one has to vote against a proposal. One has to try to understand that different

[Tagging] historic=tank

2017-04-15 Thread Michal Fabík
Hi, I just mapped my third tank in about a month and I'm still wondering why it isn't documented in the Wiki alongside historic=aircraft, historic=locomotive etc. There's quite a few of them mapped already, according to Taginfo. One could argue that tanks are more often than not parts of war mem

Re: [Tagging] historic=tank

2017-04-15 Thread Warin
On 16-Apr-17 08:20 AM, Michal Fabík wrote: Hi, I just mapped my third tank in about a month and I'm still wondering why it isn't documented in the Wiki alongside historic=aircraft, historic=locomotive etc. There's quite a few of them mapped already, according to Taginfo. One could argue that ta

Re: [Tagging] Platform screen doors and automatic platform gates

2017-04-15 Thread John Willis
Javbw > On Apr 16, 2017, at 12:49 AM, jc86035 wrote: > > It'd be easier for mappers to just add a tag to the platform > or the side of the platform area. It might just be a tagged value of the transportation platform (like covered=yes), but unmapped. Or perhaps, since the barrier is quite

[Tagging] Why is this building not rendered?

2017-04-15 Thread Tom Hardy
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/44.95741/-93.36230 should show a building=school (with amenity=school and other tags including an incorrect addr:housenumber and addr:city). The standard layer doesn't show it but every other layer does, and it appears normal in the ID editor. Clicking the

Re: [Tagging] Why is this building not rendered?

2017-04-15 Thread Warin
Way: Peter Hobart Elementary School (341791043) I think tagging it both as a; amenity=school and building=school has confused things. I would remove the amenity=school and place that on a node with the name and address stuff. Leave the building as a 'Plain Jane' building=school. The wiki

Re: [Tagging] Why is this building not rendered?

2017-04-15 Thread Clifford Snow
I agree with Warin's recommended tagging, but W. Harry Davis Academy [1] renders and it's tagged the same way. I'd open a ticket or ask on IRC. [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/44.98127/-93.29903 On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Way: Peter Hobart E

Re: [Tagging] Why is this building not rendered?

2017-04-15 Thread Tom Hardy
On Sunday, April 16, 2017 3:40:35 PM CDT Warin wrote: > Way: Peter Hobart Elementary School (341791043) > > I think tagging it both as a; > > amenity=school > > and > > building=school > > has confused things. > [...] Yes, I had considered that but I can't prove it. ;) And I watched the buil