On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Thilo Haug OSM <th...@gmx.de> wrote: > In Germany this is the same : > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Post
As I wrote before, it is not because something does not exists in one country, that one has to vote against a proposal. One has to try to understand that different countries with different traditions and tagging needs. In Belgium you can e.g buy tax stamps in a post office, and not in a courier office. I doubt people will go to DHL/UPS/... to send their Christmas cards. We also know that you can do certain money transactions in a post office, etc. So in case there would be a office of one of those couriers where one can only bring parcels, it would be nice to have a different key. I also do not understand why people do not want that there are 2 different "top" level tags for those two concepts. If you need to use the data, you can still merge the 2 features. That is much easier than trying to split them, especially since the proposed tagging is amenity=post_office and amenity=post_office + courier=yes. Which means that the current data consumers will make no difference between the two. We have different words for the two concepts in many languages, so why can't we use those two words in mapping/tagging ? m. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
