Hello,
I've noticed several typo errors in tag values. I would like to fix them
when it is obvious. When they all came from one user, it's easy to
contact him and agree on a fix. When it's worldwide and multi
contributors it becomes difficult to identify the right contributor for
each tag and
Hmm...
The building_passage tag (65 445) is a new one to me.
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=building_passage
Looking at the wiki it's very similar to covered=yes (254 624)
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/covered
I thought there was a discussion here where it was agreed to be
Yes, an obvious one: a building_passage *goes through a building* :)
Semantically it is quite important to distinguish between a
colonnade/arcade and a building passage (BTW, also arcades and colonnades
have their own tag). covered=yes just implies that the building is over the
highway, but it mig
Thank you for your feedback.
This is an important topic but I think that fixing a typo and approving
a tag are two different needs. Whether this tag is validated or not, I
think it should be fixed because the intent of those contributors was to
put building_passage and not those fancy variatio
W dniu 10.09.2016 13:23, Simone Saviolo napisał(a):
Yes, an obvious one: a building_passage *goes through a building* :)
Semantically it is quite important to distinguish between a
colonnade/arcade and a building passage (BTW, also arcades and
colonnades have their own tag). covered=yes just imp
By the way the subject of the mail was "Typo fix for
tunnel=building_passage and how to proceed in the future" and not a
discussion on which tag to choose, so I restore it to not confuse
people. Please don't associate with my question something else ;-) .
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
Le 10/09/2016
LeTopographeFou wrote:
> But do I have to ask for a vote/discussion for automated typo edits?
Very expressly no. There is no precedent for voting on automated edits, and
on the rare occasions it has been suggested then there has been significant
and well-founded opposition to the idea.
From the A
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 12:09:56PM +0100, Dave F wrote:
> Hmm...
> The building_passage tag (65 445) is a new one to me.
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=building_passage
>
> Looking at the wiki it's very similar to covered=yes (254 624)
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/covere
On 10/09/2016 11:42, LeTopographeFou wrote:
I've noticed several typo errors in tag values. I would like to fix
them when it is obvious.
In the case of "tunnel=buildig_passage" it's pretty obvious what the
previous mapper meant. The only caveat I'd add (which you may only not
have mentioned
On 10/09/2016 11:42, LeTopographeFou wrote:
I've noticed several typo errors in tag values. I would like to fix
them when it is obvious.
let's try that again but without pressing "send" instead of "edit" :)
In the case of "tunnel=buildig_passage" it's pretty obvious what the
previous mapper m
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 01:43:48PM +0200, Daniel Koć wrote:
> BTW: There's also another interesting and quite established tag -
> highway=corridor, which I've found lately:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcorridor
I find the description somewhat lacking:
* does highway=corri
Ok, I got the point.
I will wait a little bit but i'm happy if there is no complicated
process to follow for editing typos at a larger scale (22 is a small
start but I've exemples with thousands of typos which are hopefully
associated to millions of well-written and documented values).
Yours
I encounter more and more playground ("play zones") in forests. These
are areas were children can use the natural materials they find to
build huts, bridges, etc. and run around freely outside the dedicated
paths. Typically there is no playground equipment, although in some
occasional cases you mig
Maybe just add playground_type=forest_playground, nature_playground or
something like that.
Janko
Dana 10. ruj 2016. 16:43 osoba "Marc Gemis" napisala
je:
> I encounter more and more playground ("play zones") in forests. These
> are areas were children can use the natural materials they find to
playground:theme=* is somewhat established already.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground#Themes
Janko Mihelić wrote on 2016/09/10 17:28:
Maybe just add playground_type=forest_playground, nature_playground or
something like that.
Dana 10. ruj 2016. 16:43 osoba "Marc Gemis" mail
15 matches
Mail list logo
