Hoi,
I like to suggest the following structured approach to tackle
the multi-value (MV) topic:
Phase 1: Are MV necessary?
First, collect examples of seemingly necessary MVs in a wiki
page. Classify them as ordered and unordered MVs. Discuss
alternative tagging possibilities, which don't need MV
I think Colin Smale already set up such a page, see Examples on [1]
This was part of a longer discussion earlier this year [2]
Some examples that were mentioned in the thread are missing I think:
e.g. turn:lanes and opening_hours.
regards
m
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_featur
As others have mentioned, telephone/fax are very frequent in many
parts of the world, hence the option of using them. The description
says "and/or", meaning that they are optional.
However, I am persuaded by comments here and on the wiki page that the
PRINCIPAL role of the place should be the prov
Dave, as you'll note in another email I just sent, I will drop gaming
centres from the Internet_cafe proposal. I have been to a couple of these,
and one didn't focus on Internet services, while the other did. I suppose
if you're looking for a gaming centre, you're probably not looking for an
intern
On 25.02.2016 08:47, markus schnalke wrote:
> By no means, we should treat the result of this proposal as the
> end of the MV discussion, it should rather be seen as the beginning.
+1, thats what I also intended
0x3CBE432B.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
On 25.02.2016 01:46, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
> What you did is not wrong, editing the wiki and emailing the list at
> the same time is the pragmatic thing to do. Even taking the vote
> counts to approve the proposal is not wrong, most would even say it's
> right :p
I still dont get your point, th
On 25.02.2016 01:37, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
>> At least, you should have pointed out your decision before
>> you did the changes.
>
> As far as I can tell, you're just as "guilty" of editing the wiki and
> emailing the list at the same time (modulo typing speed) as I am. Your
> approval of the
On 25.02.2016 06:57, Marc Gemis wrote:
> How can we let more people with more different backgrounds participate in
> the tagging definition process ? And do we want this ?
>
> I have no idea.
>
just before I read this topic, I started a thread in the (german, sorry)
forum to discuss about a Propos
I am not literate in German, but I think the idea of a dedicated website to
proposal, or at least a tool outside of the Wiki proper would be very
helpful.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 4:46 PM Hakuch wrote:
> On 25.02.2016 06:57, Marc Gemis wrote:
> > How can we let more people with more different bac
There I asked to form a working group for a project like this. Because I
myself don't have the time or capacity to work on this alone. It would
even be better when more people could participate in something like this
On 25.02.2016 22:48, Dominic Coletti wrote:
> I am not literate in German, but I
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:59:41 +0100 Johnparis
wrote:
> Dave, as you'll note in another email I just sent, I will drop gaming
> centres from the Internet_cafe proposal. I have been to a couple of
> these, and one didn't focus on Internet services, while the other
> did. I suppose if you're looking
11 matches
Mail list logo
