On 14/02/2016 6:38 PM, John Willis wrote:
Javbw
On Feb 14, 2016, at 2:09 PM, Andrew Errington wrote:
Changing the tags because you don't like the rendering is not the right
approach. It would be better to lobby for a change of rendering, or use a
different renderer.
Since everything from
I disagree. If we use something specific like footway=hiking then that
implies the path is only for hiking.
It's a path. Its purpose is for whatever you want to do. highway=path
perfectly encapsulates the idea "there is a path here".
'hiking' could be used as a tag on a route, which is a set o
Sorry ... longer version
highway=footway
footway=hiking
On 14/02/2016 7:47 PM, Andrew Errington wrote:
I disagree. If we use something specific like footway=hiking then
that implies the path is only for hiking.
It's a path. Its purpose is for whatever you want to do.
highway=path perfec
Javbw
> On Feb 14, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> surface and width tags, as well as sac_scale
None of those tags convey the difference implied primary/tertiary/...track.
The track grade scale and the sac scale both
___
Tag
I Hit send by accident.
Javbw
> On Feb 14, 2016, at 10:01 PM, John Willis wrote:
>
>
> None of those tags convey the difference implied primary/tertiary/...track.
>
> The track grade scale and the sac scale both
...convey the degree or grade of the way,
However track has its own key val
Javbw
> On Feb 14, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Andrew Errington wrote:
>
> It's a path
All non-motorways are roads for cars.
Just add the width and surface and let's depreciate all the other values.
primary/secondary/tertiary/unclassified/residential/service/track and have only
highway=road.
All th
Javbw
> On Feb 14, 2016, at 5:03 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> footway=hiking
Footway=trail, as it can be used for many activites, including hiking.
I would love to have a separate main key value for a trail, just like track.
We differentiate between a gravel driveway and a
On 9 February 2016 at 04:57, Dave Swarthout wrote:
>
> @Matthijs,
>
> I like what you've done so far. I think using office=government and then
> following that additional tags to more closely define what sort of
> administration is done by that office is a good way to proceed.
>
> I would sugges
Hi all,
Voting for the proposal for office=government is now open. The
proposal also proposes to mark the alternatives
amenity=public_building and office=administrative as 'discouraged'.
The proposal can be found here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Government_offices
Thank
Hi all,
Voting for the proposal to replace shop=jewelry by shop=jewellery is still open.
The proposal can be found here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Jewellery_shop
I would like to thank all voters in advance for their contribution.
-- Matthijs
_
On 9 February 2016 at 00:20, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> What do you think, would it make sense to try to keep both shop=art
> and tourism=gallery? Or should we discourage either of these options
> in favour of the other? Or should we come up with new tags?
Most people seem to be in favour for kee
On 9 February 2016 at 02:39, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2016-02-09 0:20 GMT+01:00 Matthijs Melissen :
>>
>> What do you think, would it make sense to try to keep both shop=art
>> and tourism=gallery?
> I'm for keeping both, but would prefer a less ambiguous tag for the latter,
> e.g. amenity=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2016년 02월 15일 00:55, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> On 9 February 2016 at 02:39, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>>
>> 2016-02-09 0:20 GMT+01:00 Matthijs Melissen
>> :
>>>
>>> What do you think, would it make sense to try to keep both
>>> shop=art and t
On 15 February 2016 at 01:29, Max wrote:
> I see two reasons why it would make sense:
>
> 1. the word gallery alone seems to cause so much confusion because of
> its ambiguity.
> 2. if we depreciate tourism=gallery and introduce
> amenity=contemporary_art_gallery it would make it clear which tag i
Dear all,
Currently, we have the following confectionery related tags:
* shop=confectionery (12045 instances)
* shop=chocolate (730 instances)
* shop=pastry (708 instances)
How should we tag a shop selling cakes? A shops selling croissants and
cinnamon rolls? A shop focussed on chocolate, but al
oh my god, I didn't recognize that this was a real proposal process and
a voting already has started.
I also love to care for more consistency in the data, but this will
result in the straight opposite of consistency. With 20.000 against 200,
and "Editors and data consumers only support the Ameri
On 15/02/2016 11:35 AM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 15 February 2016 at 01:29, Max wrote:
I see two reasons why it would make sense:
1. the word gallery alone seems to cause so much confusion because of
its ambiguity.
2. if we depreciate tourism=gallery and introduce
amenity=contemporary_art_g
If us_en is allowed once .. it may well become the dominate entry. Then OSM
will have a few remaining tag using uk-en and these will then be subject to
change to us-en.
Fight it here, overcome it and it can be overcome again.
I have nothing against other languages being used .. provided they ar
On 15/02/2016 11:39 AM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
Dear all,
Currently, we have the following confectionery related tags:
* shop=confectionery (12045 instances)
* shop=chocolate (730 instances)
* shop=pastry (708 instances)
How should we tag a shop selling cakes? A shops selling croissants and
c
sent from a phone
> Am 15.02.2016 um 00:55 schrieb Matthijs Melissen :
>
> Currently, basically nobody uses tourism=gallery to tag art museums
> (even though the wiki specifies so), so I don't think there is a need
> to change the tag to something like tourism=contemporary_art_gallery.
you k
sent from a phone
> Am 15.02.2016 um 01:39 schrieb Matthijs Melissen :
>
> Should we preserve the shop=chocolate and shop=pastry tags, or should
> we make them subtags of shop=confectionery (or shop=bakery)?
having both, bakery and confectionery, seems to indicate that there is also
room for
21 matches
Mail list logo
