-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2016년 02월 15일 00:55, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > On 9 February 2016 at 02:39, Martin Koppenhoefer > <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> 2016-02-09 0:20 GMT+01:00 Matthijs Melissen >> <i...@matthijsmelissen.nl>: >>> >>> What do you think, would it make sense to try to keep both >>> shop=art and tourism=gallery? > >> I'm for keeping both, but would prefer a less ambiguous tag for >> the latter, e.g. amenity=contemporary_art_gallery > > Currently, basically nobody uses tourism=gallery to tag art > museums (even though the wiki specifies so), so I don't think there > is a need to change the tag to something like > tourism=contemporary_art_gallery.
I see two reasons why it would make sense: 1. the word gallery alone seems to cause so much confusion because of its ambiguity. 2. if we depreciate tourism=gallery and introduce amenity=contemporary_art_gallery it would make it clear which tag is old and should be carefully reevaluated or is a new one following the new scheme. m. ps: I don't like the tourism key for museum or gallery. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlbBG/EACgkQ3EB7kzgMM6I8GwCfZmjiSB4KdR3LjsCKFbeGxT/M Lz0AnRcJDd3VKzE8Gim78HbgcOQCXaRy =e8y+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
