sent from a phone
> Am 18.09.2015 um 07:33 schrieb Colin Smale :
>
> Can we assume the houses at the ends of terraces are to be tagged as semi
> detached?
My dictionary believes those are called "end-terrace_house" (in German
"Reihenendhaus"), while the semidetached house in German would b
Hi,
On 09/18/2015 07:33 AM, Colin Smale wrote:
> Can we assume the houses at the ends of terraces are to be tagged as
> semi detached? This needs a bit more thinking through...
When someone adds copious "is_in" tags to things, or when they create
relations like "all cycleways in Cambridge", we te
Thursday 17 September 2015 16:48:48, Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > Am 17.09.2015 um 16:29 schrieb Ruben Maes :
> >
> > building:type=semidetached_house,
>
> is ok for me. We should write a definition into the wiki, thank you for
> preparing a proposal.
>
> > building:type=d
Friday 18 September 2015 09:47:12, Frederik Ramm:
> When someone adds copious "is_in" tags to things, or when they create
> relations like "all cycleways in Cambridge", we tell them: Don't bother
> doing that, we use a spatial database, and we can compute these things
> from the data.
>
> I'd say
On 18/09/2015, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I'd say the same applies to houses. Whether something is one half of a
> double house, or semi-detached, or terraced, or free-standing - isn't
> that something that I can automatically determine by looking at the
> nearby mapped buildings?
+1 I've always tagg
sent from a phone
> Am 18.09.2015 um 10:00 schrieb Ruben Maes :
>
> None of those values are OK, but iD wants us to embrace semidetached_house?
I believe to recall that this value was discussed at least on the German
mailing list, I don't perceive it as pushed by iD.
cheers
Martin
__
sent from a phone
> Am 18.09.2015 um 09:47 schrieb Frederik Ramm :
>
> I'd say the same applies to houses. Whether something is one half of a
> double house, or semi-detached, or terraced, or free-standing - isn't
> that something that I can automatically determine by looking at the
> nearby ma
sent from a phone
> Am 18.09.2015 um 10:20 schrieb Ruben Maes :
>
> Doppelhäuser which is not exactly the same as just two houses that share a
> wall, right?
it depends how you use the word "Doppelhaus". Legally it means 2 touching
houses on 2 parcels. Architectonically it means 2 more or l
W dniu 03.09.2015 16:21, Mateusz Konieczny napisał(a):
Using different tagging for heliports and airports supporting planes
seems to be a good idea.
So here is my quick draft documenting aeroway=heliport scheme:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/aeroway%3Dheliport
Definiti
It's not all that clear to me. Are you proposing the tag aeroway=heliport
to be used in the specific case of a helipad that is part of a regular
airport instead of using aeroway=helipad?
If so, do you recommend we continue using the helipad tagging in the case
of a separate facility for helicopter
W dniu 18.09.2015 15:31, Dave Swarthout napisał(a):
It's not all that clear to me. Are you proposing the tag
aeroway=heliport to be used in the specific case of a helipad that is
part of a regular airport instead of using aeroway=helipad?
If so, do you recommend we continue using the helipad tag
Okay, that's clearer.
Thanks.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Daniel Koć wrote:
> W dniu 18.09.2015 15:31, Dave Swarthout napisał(a):
>
>> It's not all that clear to me. Are you proposing the tag
>> aeroway=heliport to be used in the specific case of a helipad that is
>> part of a regular airp
On 14.09.2015 23:17, Richard wrote:
> if it has an assigned level=* as part of the building than that would
> be better than location=rooftop. Or maybe both together.
Both together would also be an option. The thing is, I expect this to be
commonly mapped independently from the indoor environment,
We had a lot of problems related to rendering paths and footways in
osm-carto. In the end it was clear we don't know exactly what both these
types are, because many people have many different assumptions. Not even
paved/unpaved classification is satisfactory for everybody.
That's why I think w
Am 17.09.2015 um 16:29 schrieb Ruben Maes
:
building:type=semidetached_house,
unlike what I wrote before, the correct tags seem to be, if one
wants to tag what is already in geometry:
building=house
building:type=semidetached
With no discussion on the relevant talk page ..
This page has been labelled for deletion.
As I use this page to check for any new proposals up for voting it forms
an essential part of my voting on new proposals.
Are there any who support the deletion of this page?
__
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> it depends how you use the word "Doppelhaus". Legally it means 2 touching
> houses on 2 parcels. Architectonically it means 2 more or less symmetric
> buildings that touch. They don't have to share the same materials or
> colours (mos
> On Sep 18, 2015, at 10:50 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
>
> "A heliport is a small airport suitable only for use by helicopters.
> Heliports typically contain one or more helipads and may have limited
> facilities such as fuel, lighting, a windsock, or even hangars. In larger
> towns and cities
What page exactly?
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> With no discussion on the relevant talk page ..
>
> This page has been labelled for deletion.
>
> As I use this page to check for any new proposals up for voting it forms
> an essential part of my voting on
Sorry .. I've had some time now to think on it ... the page is here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Proposed_features_%22Voting%22
What struck me .. was .. no discussion, not even on the talk page of
the wiki.
the 'new' page here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Prop
20 matches
Mail list logo
