[Tagging] Drafting proposal: use oneway=reversible or create tag?

Hello, there. I'm drafting a proposal concerning some waterways whose flow regularly changes direction, which happens near some sinkholes named estavelles, which drain or feed water according to the aquifer level. I would consequently propose a way to map it, but it should be consistent with cur

Re: [Tagging] Drafting proposal: use oneway=reversible or create tag?

On 07/09/2015, David Marchal wrote: > I'm drafting a proposal concerning some waterways whose flow regularly > changes direction, which happens near some sinkholes named estavelles, which > drain or feed water according to the aquifer level. I would consequently > propose a way to map it, but it s

Re: [Tagging] Drafting proposal: use oneway=reversible or create tag?

2015-09-07 17:57 GMT+02:00 moltonel 3x Combo : > I don't know of an existing tag. I've searched for 'flow' and > 'up/downstream' in taginfo, but the only thing I found came from > imports and had very bad values from an OSM POV. Unless somebody has a > better Idea, I suggest creating a tag. > wate

Re: [Tagging] Drafting proposal: use oneway=reversible or create tag?

It seems that oneway:flow=yes|no is extensively used in Florida and oneway:flow=yes appears on most of the length of the Missisippi. I suppose it's used in the same sense as you want to use your proposed tag On 7 September 2015 at 17:29, David Marchal wrote: > Hello, there. > > I'm drafting a pr

Re: [Tagging] Drafting proposal: use oneway=reversible or create tag?

I am need of a tag for this for many waterways near the sea here, as there waterflow is controlled by gates or is tidal or is both. I like flow_direction. However it's a tricky business. Take the river Thames, which can be tidal up to London, depending on tides (and wind). But I would be reluctant

Re: [Tagging] Proposed mechanical edit: surface=soil to surface=dirt (history (authors of changesets))

Wednesday 02 September 2015 13:51:09, André Pirard: > What policy, what purpose, that's unclear? > Is OSM.org using that API to display the history on the screen illegal? > Is Osmose using it to attribute errors to some user illegal? > Yep, I suppose that making oneself a complete list of OSM users

Re: [Tagging] Drafting proposal: use oneway=reversible or create tag?

On 7 September 2015 17:38:45 GMT+01:00, Volker Schmidt wrote: >tidal >up to London, depending on tides (and wind). But I would be reluctant >to >tag the river's water flow from London downwards as flow_direction=both Yes, rivers can be tidal without their flow reversing. The water level can ri

Re: [Tagging] Drafting proposal: use oneway=reversible or create tag?

On 8/09/2015 2:16 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2015-09-07 17:57 GMT+02:00 moltonel 3x Combo >: I don't know of an existing tag. I've searched for 'flow' and 'up/downstream' in taginfo, but the only thing I found came from imports and had very bad values

Re: [Tagging] Drafting proposal: use oneway=reversible or create tag?

> On Sep 8, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Flow direction is the best of these (so far). It is descriptive of what is to > be tagged. What do they use for pipelines? I imagine there is some tag based on the way direction that can indicate flow. Javbw_

[Tagging] barrier enforcing maxwidth

I was driving in Chiba and Saitama yesterday and encountered a couple new types of barriers. I realized later one is traffic_calming=chicane. The other one is all over rural Japan as traffic_calming=choker on rural roads that could bypass traffic near the rivers, - but this one is not for traf

Re: [Tagging] barrier enforcing maxwidth

I don't think a new tag is warranted. maxwidth=* is fairly unequivocal. If map users or routers want to interpret it as "max width, but probably not really, there's probably a bit of extra space, I mean, who's going to be that petty" then that's not your problem. Since most roads do not have a ma

Re: [Tagging] barrier enforcing maxwidth

Im talking about how to tag the barrier. That thing was **tight** and very unusual to find in a major urban area. The amount of scars on the poles was amazing. The hight restriction barrier (a common thing) is tagged along with maxheight - this barrier seemed to be the same - if you are over

Re: [Tagging] barrier enforcing maxwidth

So tag a short section of the road before and after the bridge with a maxwidth tag. It could differ from the maxwidth of the bridge, but routing software should determine the minimum maxwidth for any section of a route (and avoid or penaliseit accordingly). On 8 September 2015 at 14:59, John Will

Re: [Tagging] barrier enforcing maxwidth

On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 12:38:53 +0900 johnw wrote: > Is this a reason for creating barrier=width_restrictor ? Yes, construction itself also may be mapped (in addition to maxwidth). Though it would be a good idea to document it on wiki (maybe put through proposal to ensure that it is not duplicatin

Re: [Tagging] barrier enforcing maxwidth

I use "maxwidth" to map the max width road signs, which represent a legal access restriction, not necessaryly a physical acess restriction. I use "width" to tag the physical width of a road. If there is an object on the road that physicslly limits the width of the vehicles you can use the tag bar