sent from a phone
> Am 21.07.2015 um 03:17 schrieb John Willis :
>
> It is probably not practical to tag the stairs, ladders, platforms, holes,
> and other access points that make up the center core of large playground
> structures,
why not? It is the way to go for me, if I am to add more d
sent from a phone
> Am 20.07.2015 um 23:24 schrieb John Eldredge :
>
> You also have exceptions such as the Albert Memorial in London, England.
can you explain this: is it a memorial or a monument in osm (for you)?
cheers
Martin
___
Tagging mail
sent from a phone
> Am 20.07.2015 um 23:31 schrieb Daniel Koć :
>
> 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Military_Cemetery,_Warsaw (cemetery
> with dedication, obelisk and taking a lot of space, and even mentioned as
> "monument" in the body of article and is officially called "mausoleum"
sent from a phone
> Am 20.07.2015 um 23:11 schrieb Daniel Koć :
>
> "A memorial object, especially large (one can go inside, walk on or through
> it)
walk on it doesn't sound like a reasonable criterium (you can walk on any
pebble for instance).
> *or high enough (at least a dozen or so
sent from a phone
> Am 20.07.2015 um 22:45 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann :
>
> That has nothing to do with semicolons. It's a general problem with tag
> combinations. Say, if you use pub=yes + hotel=yes, you still cannot specify
> different opening hours. Same thing with amenity=pub + tourism=gues
W dniu 21.07.2015 9:23, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
walk on it doesn't sound like a reasonable criterium (you can walk on
any pebble for instance).
There may be some monuments that have no holes to enter, but one can go
on them with staircases probably.
I wouldn't require any particula
One thing that perhaps might want to be captured in other disputes is
what happens when one country actually occupies and controls the
disputed territory. There, there's a de facto border and a claim.
Yes, I started with the easy case where not country is occupying the
disputed area and both
sent from a phone
> Am 21.07.2015 um 11:20 schrieb Daniel Koć :
>
> "A memorial object, especially large (one can go inside, walk on or through
> it) or high enough (at least a dozen or so meters), built to remember, show
> respect to a person or group of people or to commemorate an event.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Eric Sibert
wrote:
> Yes, I started with the easy case where not country is occupying the
> disputed area and both countries agree on the limits of the disputed area.
> There should be a similar case between USA and Canada for islands near
> Vancouver.
Curious i
W dniu 21.07.2015 13:03, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
much better, still 12 meters are a lot, if you think about standing in
front of an 8 meters high object, that's already pretty monumental.
That's why I added "or so". We can also add a practical hint, which is
BTW the real meaning and c
I would classify it as a monument, given its size. However, its official
name is the Albert Memorial. It honors Prince Albert, Queen Victoria's consort.
-
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love
sent from a phone
> Am 21.07.2015 um 14:19 schrieb John Eldredge :
>
> I would classify it as a monument, given its size.
me too.
> However, its official name is the Albert Memorial. It honors Prince Albert,
> Queen Victoria's consort.
Yes, a lot of stuff we tag as historic=monument has
sent from a phone
> Am 21.07.2015 um 14:18 schrieb Daniel Koć :
>
> object=memorial (not even historic, because it may be built nowadays - let's
> get rid of those compulsive categories!)
I don't read "historic" in a way that the object has to be old, but that it is
an object that refers to
My idea is to replace the use of 'inner', 'outer' (and the deprecated
'exclave', and 'enclave') roles in a type=boundary relation with
'defacto' and 'dejure' (or 'claimed') roles. The 'inner' and 'outer'
roles are very trivial to compute (assuming a relation is properly
constructed) and are actuall
Hi
New life preservers have been placed in my city along the river:
https://twitter.com/AvonFireRescue/status/623478918729854976
Two questions:
1. Life ring http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dlife_ring
seems a little specific & out of date. The self inflating jacket appears
to
sent from a phone
> Am 21.07.2015 um 16:12 schrieb Eugene Alvin Villar :
>
> My idea is to replace the use of 'inner', 'outer' (and the deprecated
> 'exclave', and 'enclave') roles in a type=boundary relation with
> 'defacto' and 'dejure' (or 'claimed') roles.
these could make sense as tags o
I think it would be better to create separate relations for disputed
territories instead of introducing new roles. Your approach would break
many existing applications.
There's already a proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/DisputedTerritories
Am 21.07.2015 um 16:12
Im referring to the base platforms that make up the "uninteresting" part of a
large playground piece. The other things are usually attached to it. Maybe it
has a ladder or steps on one side, but it is the mundane part - the structure.
The slide, rope bridge, zip line, etc are all bolted on the s
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:52 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
> I would prefer to have that in the playground:theme=* tag,
> thus playground=structure and
> playground:theme=octopus_mountain|ship|castle|dungeon|etc
If they were a one-off, yea, but they are a named playground item here (like
climbing hi
19 matches
Mail list logo
