[Tagging] Multiple values with semicolons (was: Voting - Blood donation 2)

Fkv voted no on Blood donation 2 because he believes the donation:compensation:* keys will cause inconsistencies, e.g. donation:compensation=no together with donation:compensation:payment=yes. I can see his point though I don't think it would happen often. He proposes to use a semicolon-separated

Re: [Tagging] Multiple values with semicolons (was: Voting - Blood donation 2)

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Ruben Maes wrote: > He proposes to use a semicolon-separated list, e.g. > donation:compensation=payment;vouchers. > We both know this is controversial, but why in fact?[1] It is supposed > to be hard to interpret for data consumers, but can't they just as > easil

Re: [Tagging] Playground equipment

John Willis wrote on 2015-07-20 00:35: Because it is under the playground tag, just "structure" should be fine. Structure might be a good value for a large piece, if the other pieces > (bridges, slides, climbing nets, etc) are large enough to be mappable > (like a very large installation at a p

Re: [Tagging] Playground equipment

I was waiting for some more reactions, but for now playground=structure seems the best value for me. And I leave the more detailed mapping of the individual parts to someone else for now, someone with better pictures, aerial images or GPS waypoints. I'll add the material=wood Is it OK to add this

Re: [Tagging] Playground equipment

Marc Gemis wrote on 2015-07-20 12:14: I was waiting for some more reactions, but for now playground=structure seems the best value for me. ... Is it OK to add this with a picture to the wikipage ? Fine for me. You might add that rather high in the example list, I'd say. Do you have a CC-com

Re: [Tagging] Playground equipment

Any of the pictures from my original mail can be used. They are mine and I can upload them to commons wikimedia. regards m On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > Marc Gemis wrote on 2015-07-20 12:14: > >> I was waiting for some more reactions, but for now playground=structure >

Re: [Tagging] Disputed area

Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> writes: > On 20/07/2015 1:08 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: >> So perhaps a relation that carries the border tag with two ways as >> members. The relation would have the boundary tags, and also a disputed >> tag of some sort listing the set of countries involved in the disp

Re: [Tagging] Playground equipment

sent from a phone > Am 20.07.2015 um 12:14 schrieb Marc Gemis : > > I was waiting for some more reactions, but for now playground=structure seems > the best value for me. this is almost not more information than without it, all playgrounds will have some kind of playing structure- unless it

Re: [Tagging] Playground equipment

sent from a phone > Am 20.07.2015 um 00:46 schrieb John Willis : > > Playground=tako_no_yama I think this is ok, if these are indeed japan specific, but I'd add a namespace like this: playground=jp:tako_no_yama cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailin

Re: [Tagging] Playground equipment

sent from a phone > Am 20.07.2015 um 12:09 schrieb Tom Pfeifer : > > Andy Mabbett wrote on 2015-07-20 00:44:> On 19 July 2015 at 15:37, > > I would just tag as "playground=climbingframe" with "material=wood". > > I tend to disagree here since climbingframe is one of the specific elements. > Ma

Re: [Tagging] Playground equipment

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2015-07-20 20:56: Am 20.07.2015 um 12:14 schrieb Marc Gemis : I was waiting for some more reactions, but for now playground=structure seems the best value for me. this is almost not more information than without it, all playgrounds will have some kind of playing st

Re: [Tagging] Multiple values with semicolons (was: Voting - Blood donation 2)

On 20.07.2015 10:55, Marc Gemis wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Ruben Maes > wrote: > > He proposes to use a semicolon-separated list, e.g. > donation:compensation=payment;vouchers. There is also a third option: Dropping the pure donation:compens

Re: [Tagging] How to recognize memorial from monument?

Seems like this message got lost (in the moderation maybe), so I send it again: W dniu 12.07.2015 17:04, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a): importance: memorials are smaller. The walk into criterion is often useful but should not be seen too strict. E.g. this obelisk, weighting 455 tons and with

Re: [Tagging] Multiple values with semicolons (was: Voting - Blood donation 2)

On 20/07/2015 21:45, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: The only solution is to split the object (e.g. 2 separate nodes). Not so - a tag of the form := would allow more than one object to be separately tagged on the same node or way. e.g.: pub:opening_hours=* hotel:opening_hours=* _

Re: [Tagging] How to recognize memorial from monument?

You also have exceptions such as the Albert Memorial in London, England. -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr. On July 20, 2015 4:12:44 PM Daniel K

Re: [Tagging] How to recognize memorial from monument?

Some objects are harder to classify even when we look at their height as a second important property of monuments - what do you think of: 1. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pomnik_Poleg%C5%82ym_i_Pomordowanym_na_Wschodzie_01.JPG (takes a lot of space, but only a central part is easily

Re: [Tagging] Disputed area

On 20/07/2015, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 20/07/2015 1:08 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: >>> So perhaps a relation that carries the border tag with two ways as >>> members. The relation would have the boundary tags, and also a disputed >>> tag of some sort listin

Re: [Tagging] Disputed area

moltonel 3x Combo writes: > How about: > * Map each boundary as that boundary's country sees it, allowing > overlaps. So the France boundary relation is according to France's > views, and vice-versa for Italy. > * Create a relation containing the boudary relations as members, with > roles litter

Re: [Tagging] Playground equipment

> On Jul 21, 2015, at 4:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > I think this is ok, if these are indeed japan specific, but I'd add a > namespace like this: > > playground=jp:tako_no_yama so if I was tagging it in english it would be playground=octopus_mountain Or in Japanese plaground=jp:た

Re: [Tagging] Playground equipment

> On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > This is almost not more information than without it I think that is untrue. If this were building=yes, then it really doesn't give a clue what the structure is. But in the playground key, every element is a separate playgrou

Re: [Tagging] Storm water control works?

Substance is floodwater, purpose is drainage. If the land floods, naturally from runoff or by heavy rain, its still flooded. The stations I'm tagging are for putting water over the levee when the river is high during a typhoon, so they can not open the normal outflow gate, as it is below the

Re: [Tagging] Playground equipment

John Willis wrote on 2015-07-21 02:14: On Jul 21, 2015, at 4:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: I think this is ok, if these are indeed japan specific, but I'd add a namespace like this: playground=jp:tako_no_yama so if I was tagging it in english it would be playground=octopus_mountain Or i