I was waiting for some more reactions, but for now playground=structure seems the best value for me. And I leave the more detailed mapping of the individual parts to someone else for now, someone with better pictures, aerial images or GPS waypoints. I'll add the material=wood
Is it OK to add this with a picture to the wikipage ? m On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfei...@computer.org> wrote: > John Willis wrote on 2015-07-20 00:35: > >> Because it is under the playground tag, just "structure" should be fine. >> >> Structure might be a good value for a large piece, if the other pieces >> > > (bridges, slides, climbing nets, etc) are large enough to be mappable > > (like a very large installation at a park). > > Yes playground=structure is good, most of the existing values do not have > the term 'play' in the key. > > The micromapper can certainly put playground=structure on the whole thing > as an area, and add nodes for the specific elements (slides etc). > > > Andy Mabbett wrote on 2015-07-20 00:44:> On 19 July 2015 at 15:37, > > I would just tag as "playground=climbingframe" with "material=wood". > > I tend to disagree here since climbingframe is one of the specific > elements. > Material is fine, of course. > > tom > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
