Do we really need to tag activity type?
Religion, sports, or operator should take care of it.
There's not a a lot of Buddhism practice at my school camp (any at all?), nor
would I expect religion to be the activity - it is merely the operator or the
thing in common. I bet the people at the J
2015-05-05 3:25 GMT+02:00 pmailkeey . :
> > Too big a jump, I think. Bearing in mind it is under leisure, how about
>> 'organised_camp' ?
>> >
>>
>> May want to hold that for something else. . .
>>
>>
> Such as ?
>
organised_camp doesn't add any information compared to "camp", any kind of
camp w
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> organised_camp doesn't add any information compared to "camp", any kind of
> camp will be organised. (medical camp, refugee camp, detention camp, summer
> camp, military camp, ...)
>
Sure it adds information.
At a "campground" each c
2015-05-05 11:01 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt :
> At a "campground" each camper is free to organize their time among their
> own group.
> At scout, military and summer camp there is a scheduled program campers
> are expected to participate in.
>
OK, agree, but still it would be bad tagging because it
It seems to me that the obvious generalisation, which would cover camps
organised for profit and by non-profits would be leisure=vacation_camp. This
simply generalises summer, and avoids the very specific British connotations
associated with holiday_camp. This does not precisely cover things l
>
>
> No, not everybody is against mechanical edits, not even a majority.
>
>
pretty hard to tell when not all mappers were questioned or bothered to
reply, not ?
please do not try to draw such conclusions without hard numbers. it does
not help your cause for mechanical edits.
regards
m.
I think we can nibble away at this for 'some time' not achieving much by
going round in circles too much. Can we look at the camp problem on a wiki
page where we can all chip in - by listing every different kind of camp we
can think of and categorising each whether leisure, commercial, individual,
Hi,
On 05/04/2015 01:07 PM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> The problem is that there is a very vocal minority against mechanical
> edits, and that minority is of the opinion that a majority cannot
> approve mechanical edits if there is a minority that disagrees.
I think that if the majority of people
On 5 May 2015 at 13:35, Marc Gemis wrote:
>> No, not everybody is against mechanical edits, not even a majority.
> pretty hard to tell when not all mappers were questioned or bothered to
> reply, not ?
If people choose not to (or are "not bothered to") comment, that's an
abstention.
Indeed, it
The core question is: should this be a top level tag:
leisure=camp_site
leisure=communal_activity_camp
leisure=caravan_site
Or subtags:
leisure=camp_site
caravans=dedicated
tents=yes
communal_activity_camp=no
sanitary_dump_station=no
leisure=camp_site
operator=Girl
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 09:44 +, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote:
>
> It seems to me that the obvious generalisation, which would cover
> camps organised for profit and by non-profits would be
> leisure=vacation_camp.
I don't think 'vacation' or 'leisure' are good terms at all. A lot of
people use t
It has been many years since I last went tent-camping, but my experience of
campgrounds in the US national park system was numbered poles marking each
campsite, a grassy area for pitching a tent, and a charcoal grill mounted on a
steel pole. You weren't allowed to cut brush or to have a fire on
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 18:22 -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> It has been many years since I last went tent-camping, but my
> experience of campgrounds in the US national park system was numbered
> poles marking each campsite, a grassy area for pitching a tent, and a
> charcoal grill mounted on a st
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:17 PM, David Bannon
wrote:
>
> > I haven’t been in a RV/caravan only type campground
>
> There are some like that, maybe a concrete or tarmac base so tent pages
> a problem, maybe operator/owner just wants self contained campers.
>
> I'd suggest for this purpose we t
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 18:54 -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>
>
>>There are some like that, maybe a concrete or tarmac base so tent
> The amenity=caravan_site was indeed invented for what amounts to a
> parking lot for overnight use by RV's.
Do you mean tourism=caravan_site (14K uses v. 1 use)?
15 matches
Mail list logo
