Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

The use of tourism=camp_site to represent a campgound or camping area will continue to confuse and confound this proposal. If the term camp_site should could be redefined to mean a spot (or pitch) where one can erect a tent or park an RV many of those problems will vanish. If you should become bold

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

On 2 May 2015 at 15:09, Dave Swarthout wrote: > The use of tourism=camp_site to represent a campgound or camping area will > continue to confuse and confound this proposal. > > UK - tourism = caravan_site - OK fully understood. tourism= camp_site - OK fully understood - tents instead of carava

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

Scouts as example, but any communal campground - Everest base camp, for instance - but deffo not tourism -- Mike. @millomweb - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable du

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

Yes, I knew that already. Just threw my 2 cents (2 pence) into the conversation to stir things up. The English flavour of OSM tags are a constant reminder that while we Americans won independence from England many years ago, we haven't entirely escaped her influence. To us pitch is something you pa

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

> Am 02.05.2015 um 02:43 schrieb Tod Fitch : > > I haven’t been in a RV/caravan only type campground but my impression is > there is a pretty big overlap between the tagging of individual pitches > within the two. this is an urban example of a small and dense one for reference: https://ww

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

> Am 02.05.2015 um 07:17 schrieb David Bannon : > > I think its sad we cannot put something more useful than "yes" after > camp_pitch= but I know someone saw a problem with my suggestion of > camp_pitch=42 ? I think this would be an elegant and short method to do it, but it will very likely

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

It may be common in some areas to allow pitching tents anywhere within a designated area. But I have mapped a couple of backcountry (backpack) trail camps that have a numbered post at each pitch, so I know that they do exist and we ought to allow for it. In the two cases I can think of at the mo

Re: [Tagging] Tag: shop: "hifi"

Sent from my iPhone On May 2, 2015, at 2:32 AM, Daniel Koć wrote: >> "electronics" says Tandy / Radio Shack / Maplin to me - with >> components, boards and soldering irons and cables/connectors. > > For me that would be "electronic_parts" or "electronic_components" these > days. +1 - these

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 13:39 -0700, Tod Fitch wrote: > It may be common in some areas to allow pitching tents anywhere within > a designated area. But I have mapped a couple of backcountry > (backpack) trail camps that have a numbered post at each pitch, Indeed. We need to cater to the full range,

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 22:22 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > camp_pitch=42 ? > I think this would be an elegant and short method to do it, but it > will very likely lead to osm-carto not supporting it (not in the key > namespace that gets included in the rendering db and unlikely there > will