On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 07:16:22AM +0300, Dave Swarthout wrote:
> I think redefining waterway=dam is gonna be a hard sell for most Americans.
> But now thanks to this list I understand why some reservoirs I've worked
> with in Thailand have had the name of the dam applied to the water behind
> them
2015-04-15 18:51 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt :
> "Western Union" is a branded money transfer service offered at many
> other types of businesses -- including convenience stores, some banks,
> pawn shops and in some countries post offices.
>
yes, but I have looked only at those instances which call
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Richard Z. wrote:
> not all of the dams are man_made, beavers are busy builders.
I want to be the first one tagging a beaver_made=dam :-)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.or
On 16/04/2015, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Richard Z. wrote:
>> not all of the dams are man_made, beavers are busy builders.
>
> I want to be the first one tagging a beaver_made=dam :-)
Seems like you could be the first, but then you'd be introducing yet
anoth
Some very original tagging here: natural=beaver_hut (???)
Also. two of those dams are tagged with layer=2. Could that possibly be
true? (LOL)
I quite love this too:
landuse=industrial
population=1000
height=0.3
levels=40
roof:shape=dome
material=paper
building=wasp_hive
Cheers,
Dave
On Thu, Apr
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> not sure if I'd put the pawnshop in this category, because it opens a whole
> field of similar stuff (e.g. second hand shops of different types). Around
> here, also post offices offer services similar to banks (i.e. they do have a
> ba
I'm opening discussion on how to best tag individual pitch numbers
within a campsite.
There are a variety of schemes in use from "tourism=caravan_site" on each
node to "campsite=pitch,ref=XXX".
This scheme seems to work fairly well:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37815651#map=18/36.49277/-121.14
>>> At most they will be access=permissive. Public implies an inalienable
>>> right of access supported by law.
>>
>> Permissive implies something *far different to me*. It means that I can
>> walk onto the property without prior arrangement, and chances are nobody
>> will hassle me.
>
> +1
> a ca
We are having a discussion in talk-br about internet_access in parks
and other open areas.
From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:internet_access and from
what I understand, it's a characteristic of the place/object (so it
should not exist without a building, amenity, tourism, shop, leisure
o
I think internet_access could be used in both ways. It can be used vaguely,
as an attribute of a restaurant, hotel, pub. Those places offer their
service of bringing you internet access. If you don't have a strong enough
signal, it just means the service is bad.
But attributing internet access to
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> But attributing internet access to a park seems strange. You can't complain
> to someone that you have bad signal at your bench. I would rather map it as
> a point if it's in the open.
Nor you can complain if it's mapped as a node inside the
As an attribute of a {marina, camp site, bar, hotel} it's clear who is
responsible.
As a standalone node it really needs an operator= and/or network= tag.
Searching for such features is presently poor, but in theory a node can be
found with
an enclosure test. The wifi will shop up in the park, th
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Dave Swarthout
wrote:
> Here in Thailand there are many vending machines that sell purified, ion
> exchanged I believe, water for drinking. Current practice seems to be to
> tag them with amenity=drinking_water and leave it at that. What opinions do
> you have on t
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:33:38 -0700
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Dave Swarthout
> wrote:
>
> > Here in Thailand there are many vending machines that sell
> > purified, ion exchanged I believe, water for drinking. Current
> > practice seems to be to tag them with amenity
That scheme seems to rely on house number model. Sure looks good.
But does it, by implication, indicate there is a (eg) a house number 12
on the unnamed service road ? I'm not into mapping house numbers so
don't know if thats important or not.
David
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 10:51 -0700, Bryce
pet, 17. tra 2015. 01:28 Nelson A. de Oliveira je
napisao:
There is also another problem: how do you find a park that offers wifi
if it's mapped as a different object?
Search for all parks that have an enclosed internet_access node, or
easier, find all parks that are les than 30m from inter
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:50 PM, David Bannon
wrote:
>
> That scheme seems to rely on house number model. Sure looks good.
>
> But does it, by implication, indicate there is a (eg) a house number 12
> on the unnamed service road ? I'm not into mapping house numbers so
> don't know if thats impor
17 matches
Mail list logo
