We are having a discussion in talk-br about internet_access in parks and other open areas.
From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:internet_access and from what I understand, it's a characteristic of the place/object (so it should not exist without a building, amenity, tourism, shop, leisure or other kind of place). If the park offers wifi, then the park should have a internet_access=wifi But there are people seeing it different: it should be used at the spot where the access is offered (where the access point is locate), since there is no guarantee that people will have wifi signal at every place of the park. For me this second view is incomplete, since we won't be able to find or tell if a shop, park or anything else offers Internet access. Also, there isn't any statement in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:internet_access that assures that the place must offer access in all its extension. What is the current convention (and better way) to use internet_access for cases like this? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
