I would like to distinguish between hiking paths and climbing_access paths.
In my area only climbers are allowed to use the paths to access the cliffs.
Therefore I thought of this tagging for climbing_access paths:
access=customers
customers=climbers
what I found so far:
path=climbing_acces
I understand access=customers, it is okay tag for this case. But what does
customers=climbers mean? How do you distinguish climbers from others?..
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/customers#values says there 25
instances with 4 values, but what exactly do they mean?
If customers=climbers mean
Wouldn't it be better to use the sac_scale [1] instead of artificially
limiting it to customers ?
regards
m
[1 ]http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:51 AM, k4r573n wrote:
> I would like to distinguish between hiking paths and climbing_access paths.
> In m
The sac_scale is about difficulty, not permission. I assume from
Karsten's original message that only climbers are permitted to use
those paths. If so, then access=customers is appropriate, and
customers=climbers seems helpful...
Dan
2014-08-07 9:50 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis :
> Wouldn't it be better
On 07.08.2014 09:51, k4r573n wrote:
> I would like to distinguish between hiking paths and climbing_access paths.
> In my area only climbers are allowed to use the paths to access the cliffs.
>
> Therefore I thought of this tagging for climbing_access paths:
> access=customers
> customers=clim
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 10:03 +0100, Dan S wrote:
> The sac_scale is about difficulty, not permission. I assume from
> Karsten's original message that only climbers are permitted to use
> those paths. If so, then access=customers is appropriate, and
> customers=climbers seems helpful...
Customers im
There are like 20x amenity=jobcentre and 65x amenity=job_centre.
Meanwhile office=employment_agency is used 1200x
On
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Jobcentre_%28plus%29 you
find:
"Currently unclear if that tag encompass government run job centres."
Checking in Germany t
2014-08-07 11:14 GMT+02:00 Philip Barnes :
> Customers implies that climbers have to pay to climb, there is someone
> controlling access, collecting money.
>
> I would go for highway=path, access=climbers.
>
>From how I understood the original poster I'd go for fee=yes /
and/or access=private.
2014-08-07 11:48 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss :
> There are like 20x amenity=jobcentre and 65x amenity=job_centre. Meanwhile
> office=employment_agency is used 1200x
>
> On http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/
> Jobcentre_%28plus%29 you find:
> "Currently unclear if that tag encompass g
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 11:48 +0200, Andreas Goss wrote:
> There are like 20x amenity=jobcentre and 65x amenity=job_centre.
> Meanwhile office=employment_agency is used 1200x
>
> On
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Jobcentre_%28plus%29 you
> find:
> "Currently unclear if tha
If I understand Karsten correctly, the limitation is not about payment,
it is to limit the number of people using this path. This would be
typical for climbing crags in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conservation
areas.
A typical example is the sandstone climbing in Saxonia/Germany, which is
It would be very very wrong to try to merge Job Centre with employment
agency.
99% of Jobcenters in Germany are tagged as office=employment_agency, so
currently the distinction you point out does not exist.
Should we tag the government ones with amenity=jobcentre in addition?
But as Martin p
Hi,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge mentions "swing" bridges without
defining them.
Apparently mappers do totally disagree what "swing" means.. out of our mapped
bridge=swing
* about half are small swinging bridges (aka simple suspension, hanging bridges)
* some are swing bridges
2014-08-07 17:25 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. :
>
> Wondering what to do with that? With just 687 objects worldwide the problem
> would be easily fixable.. just how?
I think tagging the type of bridge as road attribute might be an
exxageration. We should start mapping bridges as objects (area) and then
Good old Wiipedia helps:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridge#Types_of_bridges
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swing_bridge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_bridge
On 7 August 2014 17:25, Richard Z. wrote:
>
> Those are radically different types of bridges.. comparing
>http://www.trav
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 17:53 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2014-08-07 17:25 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. :
>
> Wondering what to do with that? With just 687 objects
> worldwide the problem
> would be easily fixable.. just how?
>
>
> I think tagging the type of bri
Yes. That is a navigable aqueduct bridge.
It is a structurally a viaduct with an aqueduct function on top. So how to
map these two orthogonal properties of this bridge? I would map this as
waterway=canal, bridge=viaduct, boat=yes, layer=x exactly as we do for a
road bridge. If you want you can add
2014-08-07 19:06 GMT+02:00 Philip Barnes :
> An aqueduct is definitely a type of bridge, i.e. one carrying a
> waterway, usually a canal over a road, river or valley.
>
> The most famous, and scariest of them all
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontcysyllte_Aqueduct
>
yes, aqueducts will usuall
On 7 August 2014 18:35, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> yes, aqueducts will usually also have bridges as parts of them (not all,
> some even run underground for instance).
>
Not true. In California the aqueducts look like navigable canals, but carry
drinking water.
> Still this is a completely d
19 matches
Mail list logo
