Cemeteries are usually divided into sectors to quickly find a given grave.
Here's a proposal to define this feature:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Cemetery_sector
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.open
thank you for setting this up. There are some comments on the talk-page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Cemetery_sector
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/
2014-07-12 23:06 GMT+02:00 Dave Swarthout :
> Same here in the U.S. Usage of the word dormitory generally applies to a
> single building, a student residence on or near a college campus.
+1, still this tag might have its sense to map a dormitory, as
building=dormitory doesn't convey this inform
On 12/07/2014 15:25, Dudley Ibbett wrote:
Hi
I was going to say that from a UK English perspective I have never
seen dormitory used in this way. However, in the context of a
dictionary definition the proposal seems to relate to the definition
with regard to a suburb "A small town or suburb
In US English we tend to say "dorm hall" or "dorm building," which seems
to be consistent with Steve's thoughts. Perhaps a less confusing way to
mark this feature would be using the term "residence area" and
"residence hall," but I don't know how much of an Americanism these
terms are.
---
Jes
2014-07-14 16:40 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
>
> 2014-07-14 12:44 GMT+02:00 Christian Quest :
>
> On the first zoom levels, I'm using the capital=* tag to select the
>> country capitals, then sorting them with decreasing population.
>> It is a very small number of objects, that can easily be m
Hi
I'm trying to work out exactly how a generic "field" would be mapped using this
new tag. I am assuming you would have a way that marks the field boundary and
in many cases this would be tagged with the barrier=fence/wall/hedge. This is
what much or my mapping currently consists of. What
Wouldn't adding attributes solve the problem you described? I.e. field
border=*
On Jul 14, 2014 2:11 PM, "Dudley Ibbett" wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to work out exactly how a generic "field" would be mapped using
> this new tag. I am assuming you would have a way that marks the field
> boundary a
