Am 06.12.2013 um 02:05 schrieb Masi Master:
> I think we don't should tag something at a private (really private) ground in
> a residential (except the house, entrance and way to it).
> IMO we don't need any private things like swimmingpools, ways, trees,
> sandboxes or playgrounds at the backy
2013/12/6 Masi Master
> I think we don't should tag something at a private (really private) ground
> in a residential (except the house, entrance and way to it).
> IMO we don't need any private things like swimmingpools, ways, trees,
> sandboxes or playgrounds at the backyard in the OSM database.
Am 06.12.2013 13:09, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> What is the argument for putting the house, the entrance and the private
> way then? IMHO we can map private trees, and I also like to map private
> swimming pools. Of course you can map private fences, walls etc., and why
> not map a private wate
I agree with Martin. Also the fact that an object (parking, garden,
swimming pool) is private is in itself useful information for the general
public. You might for example see a parking or garden on aerial imagery,
and wonder if it's possible to go there.
Related question: if someone decides to pa
I think we should tag private backyards with "surveillance=yes", even if
surveillance is executed by a satellite et not a surveillance camera.
:-) nounours77
Am 05.12.2013 um 18:46 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> 2013/12/5 Wolfgang Hinsch
> how should it be tagged? Is it ok to tag the whol
Am 06.12.2013 13:26, schrieb Matthijs Melissen:
> I agree with Martin. Also the fact that an object (parking, garden,
> swimming pool) is private is in itself useful information for the general
> public. You might for example see a parking or garden on aerial imagery,
> and wonder if it's possible
:-)
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 06/12/2013 12:32, nounours wrote:
I think we should tag private backyards with "surveillance=yes", even
if surveillance is executed by a satellite et not a surveillance camera.
:-) nounours77
Am 05.12.2013 um 18:46 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2013/12/5 Wol
Hello
Le 05/12/2013 12:16, SomeoneElse a écrit :
Axelos wrote:
I proposed the tag shop=military_surplus for the shops selling used
military equipment.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Military_surplus
If you think that it makes sense to tag a particular shop that way
just go ahead and u
Axelos wrote:
The wiki is not intended to suggest tags to make homogeneous the
database ?
The wiki's an excellent place for documenting tag usage, but one of the
things hugely in OSM's favour is that there's no enforced "list of legal
tags" - if something has never been tagged before, or no
2013/12/6 Axelos :
> Hello
>
> Le 05/12/2013 12:16, SomeoneElse a écrit :
>
>> Axelos wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I proposed the tag shop=military_surplus for the shops selling used
>>> military equipment.
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Military_surplus
>>
>>
>> If you think that it makes sense to t
On 06/12/13 13:20, SomeoneElse wrote:
Axelos wrote:
The wiki is not intended to suggest tags to make homogeneous the
database ?
The wiki's an excellent place for documenting tag usage, but one of
the things hugely in OSM's favour is that there's no enforced "list of
legal tags" - if someth
> Am 06/dic/2013 um 13:39 schrieb cracklinrain :
>
> Well, I would say a stone garden without plants is probably still a
> garden. But an area made of concrete is still a (small) yard or else. If
> it's too strange it should be tagged as artwork maybe.
>
> But by definition it seems that the as
For example to render view of city from OSM data also data about private
gardens, trees, swimming pools etc are necessary.
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 04:26:18 -0800 Matthijs Melissen
wrote
I agree with Martin. Also the fact that an object (parking, garden, swimmi
On 06/12/2013 02:05, Masi Master wrote:
I think we don't should tag something at a private (really private)
ground in a residential (except the house, entrance and way to it).
IMO we don't need any private things like swimmingpools, ways, trees,
sandboxes or playgrounds at the backyard in the O
> Am 06/dic/2013 um 14:20 schrieb SomeoneElse :
>
> In this case, there doesn't seem to me much mapping of the concept, and
> where it has been mapped, military_surplus seems to have been most used, so
> I'd just use that.
+1, but adding docu to the wiki in order to encourage uniform taggin
Hi,
Is there a tag for archbishopric or archbishop's palace? And beyond, for
any tag related to religious administrative offices?
Sincerely,
Severin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Am Freitag, den 06.12.2013, 15:20 +0100 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> > Am 06/dic/2013 um 13:39 schrieb cracklinrain :
> >
> > Well, I would say a stone garden without plants is probably still a
> > garden. But an area made of concrete is still a (small) yard or else. If
> > it's too strange i
IMHO the whole area may be a residential area, and residential includes
residential highways, houses, small parks and much more,
But I wouldn't say the whole area is a garden, so a garden should only
be tagged where there is a garden or mainly a garden.
In addition a single garden is a single garde
2013/12/6 Severin MENARD
> Hi,
>
> Is there a tag for archbishopric or archbishop's palace? And beyond, for
> any tag related to religious administrative offices?
>
for the latter you could use some office-tag and add religion=*
denomination=* etc.
the former should be inserted with the admin_
2013/12/7 Peter Wendorff
> IMHO the whole area may be a residential area, and residential includes
> residential highways, houses, small parks and much more,
> But I wouldn't say the whole area is a garden, so a garden should only
> be tagged where there is a garden or mainly a garden.
> In addit
20 matches
Mail list logo