I agree with Martin. Also the fact that an object (parking, garden, swimming pool) is private is in itself useful information for the general public. You might for example see a parking or garden on aerial imagery, and wonder if it's possible to go there.
Related question: if someone decides to pave their backyard, is it still a garden? -- Matthijs On Dec 6, 2013 12:10 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2013/12/6 Masi Master <masi-mas...@gmx.de> > >> I think we don't should tag something at a private (really private) >> ground in a residential (except the house, entrance and way to it). >> IMO we don't need any private things like swimmingpools, ways, trees, >> sandboxes or playgrounds at the backyard in the OSM database. >> > > > -1 > What is the argument for putting the house, the entrance and the private > way then? IMHO we can map private trees, and I also like to map private > swimming pools. Of course you can map private fences, walls etc., and why > not map a private waterway? Making an evaluation in which areas of the > cities there are private pools and in which there aren't might lead to > interesting results for instance. > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
