For example to render view of city from OSM data also data about private gardens, trees, swimming pools etc are necessary.
---- On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 04:26:18 -0800 Matthijs Melissen <i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote ---- I agree with Martin. Also the fact that an object (parking, garden, swimming pool) is private is in itself useful information for the general public. You might for example see a parking or garden on aerial imagery, and wonder if it's possible to go there. Related question: if someone decides to pave their backyard, is it still a garden? -- Matthijs On Dec 6, 2013 12:10 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: 2013/12/6 Masi Master <masi-mas...@gmx.de> I think we don't should tag something at a private (really private) ground in a residential (except the house, entrance and way to it). IMO we don't need any private things like swimmingpools, ways, trees, sandboxes or playgrounds at the backyard in the OSM database. -1 What is the argument for putting the house, the entrance and the private way then? IMHO we can map private trees, and I also like to map private swimming pools. Of course you can map private fences, walls etc., and why not map a private waterway? Making an evaluation in which areas of the cities there are private pools and in which there aren't might lead to interesting results for instance. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
