No, when I looked at the code last year there was no indication that you
could do that in any easy way.
The taginfo import is reported to take 10 minutes for Sweden so I guess if
the box isn't that big you can always try to extract it and import it to
your own taginfo db. Now when we have taginfo
2013/11/25 Manuel Hohmann
> > This means that by any traditional reading, the proposal has been
> > rejected, even though you seem to avoid the word.
>
> I am not avoiding anything, I am simply stating facts. And as a matter
> of fact, there are 19 positive votes, 18 negative ones, and one
> part
Am 25.11.2013 09:06, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
>
> On 11/24/2013 09:45 AM, Manuel Hohmann wrote:
>> For this reason the status has for now been reset to "proposed",
>> until there is further progress.
>
> That's a great idea, we simply get rid of the "rejected" status and
> anything that is not acce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> You are "cheating" here, the voting period finished at 23
> November, and by the 14th of November all 18 no-votes had already
> been cast, leading with this apparently clear rejection to
> desinterest by other potential rejecters. You are now countin
On 26.11.2013 11:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> This proposal was rejected
> according to our rules and I now set it to rejected in the wiki.
The rules also state "All suggestions should be taken into account
before a proposal is approved or rejected." The author is trying to do
just that.
_
2013/11/26 Tobias Knerr :
> On 26.11.2013 11:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>> This proposal was rejected
>> according to our rules and I now set it to rejected in the wiki.
>
> The rules also state "All suggestions should be taken into account
> before a proposal is approved or rejected." The a
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Dan S wrote:
> Where can I read the rules? I searched the wiki for "voting" "tag
> proposals" etc and couldn't find them.
On the "Proposed_features" main page. But don't read it as "hard-coded
rules" but more as recommendations. I don't like when people think
th
2013/11/26 Manuel Hohmann
> - - At the end of the voting period there were 18 yes, 18 no and one
> partial yes. If this in in any way a "clear" result, then it is a draw.
>
A draw means "rejected" as it isn't a majority for "yes". A "partial yes"
like an "abstain" counts as vote that isn't "yes
2013/11/26 Pieren :
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Dan S wrote:
>
>> Where can I read the rules? I searched the wiki for "voting" "tag
>> proposals" etc and couldn't find them.
>
> On the "Proposed_features" main page.
Thanks.
> But don't read it as "hard-coded
> rules" but more as recommen
2013/11/26 Dan S
> I agree strongly. In this case, with an almost perfectly inconclusive
> result, I would say it is unfair to stamp the proposal as "rejected"
> since there was not a majority no-vote;
>
actually this is how things are (and were) done nonetheless. There are lots
of proposals th
Maybe Tagwatch does what you are looking for?
http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/
Matthijs
On Nov 25, 2013 11:34 PM, "Mike Thompson" wrote:
> I would like to find all of the tags that are used over a user specified
> geography (could be a country or a bounding box). Is there anyway to do
> this for ge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> A draw means "rejected" as it isn't a majority for "yes". A
> "partial yes" like an "abstain" counts as vote that isn't "yes", so
> for practical reasons you can count this like a "no". At least this
> is what the rules had been so far.
A draw is a
2013/11/26 Manuel Hohmann
> > A draw means "rejected" as it isn't a majority for "yes".
> A draw is a draw, it's not a majority for "no" either.
yes, rejected ;-)
My aim was to unify the tagging of
> these objects, since they all generate light. This idea is not new -
> think of public_trans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> yes, rejected ;-)
I'm really not sure what you don't understand about the word DRAW or
about the fact that the total number of positive votes exceeds the
total number of negative votes. But another fact is that your opinion
does not alter any of the
Thanks for the replies. The link Mattthijs provides the information I need
for now.
Erik, good to know the run time to setup ones own taginfo db is reasonable.
Mike
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> Maybe Tagwatch does what you are looking for?
> http://tagwatch.sto
Hi,
Openstreetmap has been contributing to the Bitcoin revolution with this map:
http://coinmap.org/
the problem is that lots of online businesses want to get on the map, and I
don't know what tags to suggest. Should we invent something like
office=online? Then it could be further specified with
Placing online businesses on a world map may be more tricky than you think ...
Yves
"Janko Mihelić" a écrit :
>Hi,
>
>Openstreetmap has been contributing to the Bitcoin revolution with this
>map:
>
>http://coinmap.org/
>
>the problem is that lots of online businesses want to get on the map,
>and
On 11/26/13 4:13 PM, Yves wrote:
> Placing online businesses on a world map may be more tricky than you
> think ...
yes. the concept of a geographic location is sometimes
challenging. when the business is running a web store
in the cloud and outsourcing the order fulfillment then
it's hard to say e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 26.11.2013 22:31, Richard Welty wrote:
> yes. the concept of a geographic location is sometimes challenging.
> when the business is running a web store in the cloud and
> outsourcing the order fulfillment then it's hard to say exactly
> where t
Do we really want to delete this data? Is there any value to it?
What they usually show is the website headquarters. So maybe a good tag is
office=website_headquaters.
2013/11/26 Frederik Ramm
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> On 26.11.2013 22:31, Richard Welty wr
Janko Mihelić wrote:
http://coinmap.org/
The video on there didn't mention adding a main tag at all when I
watched it.
the problem is that lots of online businesses want to get on the map,
and I don't know what tags to suggest.
Ignoring the online businesses, there are plenty of real-
21 matches
Mail list logo
