2013/11/25 Manuel Hohmann <mhohm...@physnet.uni-hamburg.de> > > This means that by any traditional reading, the proposal has been > > rejected, even though you seem to avoid the word. > > I am not avoiding anything, I am simply stating facts. And as a matter > of fact, there are 19 positive votes, 18 negative ones, and one > partial approval. By any mathematical reading, 19 > 18. >
You are "cheating" here, the voting period finished at 23 November, and by the 14th of November all 18 no-votes had already been cast, leading with this apparently clear rejection to desinterest by other potential rejecters. You are now counting post-voting-votes on the yes side in order to obfuscate the actual result. This proposal was rejected according to our rules and I now set it to rejected in the wiki. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
