2013/11/26 Pieren <pier...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Dan S <danstowell+...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Where can I read the rules? I searched the wiki for "voting" "tag >> proposals" etc and couldn't find them. > > On the "Proposed_features" main page.
Thanks. > But don't read it as "hard-coded > rules" but more as recommendations. I don't like when people think > that the wiki is the bible. But I also don't like people saying that > the vote process should be completely ignored. Take it as a good > opportunity to express verbally a maximum of feedbacks, opinions and > arguments about tags in OSM. It's better than nothing. I agree strongly. In this case, with an almost perfectly inconclusive result, I would say it is unfair to stamp the proposal as "rejected" since there was not a majority no-vote; but equally wrong to stamp it as "sort-of-accepted" (these are the two main positions in this thread so far!). The message from the voters is clear: maybe, but not in this exact form. Maybe the authors of the proposal will refine it to a stronger proposal, or maybe they won't. But it seems to me that some informal evolution is the next thing to consider, rather than repeated rounds of hyper-formalised proposing and voting. Dan _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
