Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - More Consistency in Railway Tagging

On 13.04.2013 17:08, Martin Atkins wrote: You need to determine the railway value from the track infrastructure. In Karlsruhe (Germany) the tram has the same gauge as the rail and even runs on normal rails in some parts where in the city it is a simple tram. Living in a very detailed mapped city

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (highway=bicyle_crossing) (Alberto)

On 15.04.2013 00:17, Alberto wrote: > On 09.04.2013 15:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> 2013/4/9 Richard Fairhurst > > >> > As a result of the discussion done here about bicycle-only crossings, > I’ve made a proposal: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_f

Re: [Tagging] Power generation refinement: power plant model evolution

On 17.04.2013 01:59, François Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > 2013/4/14 François Lacombe > > > It would be great to find out what are the "state of the art" in OSM > to make a better choice than "heads or tails" : *what is used for > airports, tr

Re: [Tagging] New childcare proposal

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:13 PM, malenki wrote: > Am Tue, 16 Apr 2013 23:16:39 +0200 > schrieb def onion : > > > I kindly request your comments about this proposal -> > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare2.0 > > My first thought: > What about orphanages and facilitie

Re: [Tagging] railway=abandoned + highway=cycleway (was: [OSM-talk-be] Abandoned Railways / cycleways)

Do you realize that you are posting in html? Not a good idea if you expect anyone to read... ael ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] New childcare proposal (malenki)

Your right, orphanages are a kind of childcare facilities as well. From my point of view they are more of a long term service and i would put them to the social failities. But perhaps its a good idea to view the childcare tag under a broader perspective. What would be of interest beside orphanages?

Re: [Tagging] railway=abandoned + highway=cycleway (was: [OSM-talk-be] Abandoned Railways / cycleways)

ael wrote: > Do you realize that you are posting in html? Not a good idea if you > expect anyone to read... > > ael > > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging It would also help if

[Tagging] Surge tank

Hi, I was looking for a sustainable way to tag surge tanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surge_tank Such equipment is very useful to avoid mechanical damages to water supply infrastructure in hydraulic power plants. It absorb water exceeding in penstocks when operator decide to close valves. It

Re: [Tagging] Surge tank

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:26 PM, François Lacombe < francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu> wrote: > If nothing had been defined yet, I may use water=surge_tank on a member > node of a pipeline=water way. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pipeline ? Pieren

Re: [Tagging] Surge tank

Sure, it's pipeline definition. Surge tank is punctual feature on this pipeline. I don't see anything dealing with such equipment on this page. Usually there's no surge tank on oil & gas pipeline since pressure may be controlled by operator. Water supply in power plants is different. Pressure & a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (highway=bicyle_crossing)

>From: fly >If not possible please use highway=crossing with crossing:barrier=* and crossing:access=no crossing:bicycle=designated It may be a solution. But it is not documented and neither used, according to Taginfo. So we should decide what is the best for node-only cycleway crossing and docume

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (highway=bicyle_crossing)

2013/4/18 Alberto > >From: fly > >If not possible please use highway=crossing with crossing:barrier=* and > crossing:access=no crossing:bicycle=designated > > It may be a solution. But it is not documented and neither used, according > to Taginfo. So we should decide what is the best for node-on