On 17.04.2013 01:59, François Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > 2013/4/14 François Lacombe <francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu > <mailto:francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu>> > > It would be great to find out what are the "state of the art" in OSM > to make a better choice than "heads or tails" : *what is used for > airports, train stations, factories,... ?* > > > Airports : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Daerodrome > No relations (however often closed area). > > Train stations : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation > No relations (however often single buildings which hold the whole > station, sometimes node on railway). > > Factories : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/industrial > No relations recommended so far. > > > So current version of generation refinement proposal seems to be > consistent with large set of map features. > If you have objection with that, please told me! > > I would add in proposal that enclosed power plant may be mapped with > multipolygon relation in case of complex perimeter as explained here : > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon > > Multipolygon should be used as soon as there are two or more distinct > fenced perimeters.
Do not see any problem. If a simple area (multipolygon) is not enough you can always use a site relation. fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
