On 15.04.2013 00:17, Alberto wrote: > On 09.04.2013 15:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> 2013/4/9 Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net >> <mailto:rich...@systemed.net>> >> > As a result of the discussion done here about bicycle-only crossings, > I’ve made a proposal: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/bicycle_crossing > >> Martin Vonwald (Imagic) wrote: >>> A node with highway=crossing (or level_crossing for railways) only >>> refers to the crossing of the highway, i.e. its access tags do not >>> refer to the highway itself. >> >> Genuine question - if you have a highway=cycleway crossing a >> highway=unclassified at a shared crossing node, how do you know >> which one is >> "the highway itself"? >> >>> +1, as the width of the street is rarely 0.0 it seems more practical >>> to tag a short piece of way with access-tags (and crossing).
Thought this is clear. Please, only use highway=crossing on nodes in less detailed mapped areas. For pedestrian and bicycle use a short separate way. If not possible please use highway=crossing with crossing:barrier=* and crossing:access=no crossing:bicycle=designated Thanks _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
