Hi,
in the German Forum [1] we had a discussion about cycle lanes (with a
lot of off-topic talk). In Germany there are two different kind of
bicycle lanes:
1. "Radfahrstreifen": cycle lanes which are mandatory indicated by a
sign and a solid lane (cycleway=lane)
2. "Schutzstreifen" cycle lanes
Balgofil writes:
> 1. "Radfahrstreifen": cycle lanes which are mandatory indicated by a
> sign and a solid lane (cycleway=lane)
>
> 2. "Schutzstreifen" cycle lanes with dashed lines not so wide as a
> "Radfahrstreifen" and therefore only advisory and no sign (cycleway=?)
I think the most impo
I think shared_lane is used when the bikes are sharing the lane with cars,
perhaps with a cycle logo in the centre of the lane. Sharrows are when
there are cycle logos to one side, but no lane marking (not very common in
the UK; I've seen them in Brussels alongside parked cars, and they're more
oft
There is a thread of discussion on the Talk-us board about how and whether to represent Adopt-a-highway features. See http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-January/010086.html as the top of the thread. It was suggested that this come over to the tagging board for further discussio
There is a thread of discussion on the Talk-us board about how and whether to
represent Adopt-a-highway features. See
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-January/010086.html as
the top of the thread. It was suggested that this come over to the tagging
board for further discu
Am 12.01.2013 17:21, ceyockey wrote:
> There is a thread of discussion on the Talk-us board about how and whether
> to represent Adopt-a-highway features.
> See http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-January/010086.html
> as the top of the thread. It was suggested that this com
On 1/12/13 11:21 AM, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
There is a thread of discussion on the Talk-us board about how and whether to
represent Adopt-a-highway features. See
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-January/010086.html as
the top of the thread. It was suggested that th
I should have also pointed at the revision to the original suggestion which I
wrote after comments were provided at talk-us --> see
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-January/010187.html .
This doesn't use amenity. --ceyockey
-Original Message-
>From: Chris66
>Sent
I take it that you are suggesting the use of key:traffic_sign as the referent
for the sign containing the adopt-a-highway information. Though not said in
the Wiki page ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign ), I
generally think of a traffic sign as something which is meant to inf
On 1/12/13 2:13 PM, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
I take it that you are suggesting the use of key:traffic_sign as the referent
for the sign containing the adopt-a-highway information. Though not said in
the Wiki page ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign ), I
generally think o
Consider posting at or joining http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=67 , which is dedicated to 'indoor mapping' . I've noted this discussion thread at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Indoor_Mapping . --ceyockey
___
Tagging mailing lis
A sharrow indicates a shared_lane (one of two markings in use in the US;
the other being a bicycle symbol by itself with no chevrons, usually
accompanied by the "share the road" advisory signs; this may be Oklahoma
specific usage as Oklahoma doesn't use sharrows, however).
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at
Sharrow markings are typically (and properly) only found on bicycle routes
that do not have dedicated bicycle lanes, and bicycle boulevards.
cycleway=shared_lane in the US, save for locales that Did Not Get the
Memo™, should also have bicycle=designated and be a member of the
appropriate type=rout
This dashed/solid distinction applies to the US as well (though some
states, such as Oregon, make lanes that have restrictions such as mandatory
turns or specific traffic types, separated by double-width lines as well).
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Richard Mann <
richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail
Perhaps instead of bridge_type, it should be bridge:structure, or some
other indication that it's referring to the general engineering and
architecture of the bridge rather than the vague "type" which might get
confused with "foot, cycleway, motorway" etc; and _ which isn't a
good separator for wha
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Sharrow markings are typically (and properly) only found on bicycle
> routes
> that do not have dedicated bicycle lanes, and bicycle boulevards.
> cycleway=shared_lane in the US, save for locales that Did Not Get the
> Memo™, should also have bicycle=designated and be a mem
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> A sharrow indicates a shared_lane (one of two markings in use in the US;
> the other being a bicycle symbol by itself with no chevrons, usually
> accompanied by the "share the road" advisory signs; this may be Oklahoma
> specific usage as Okl
Your traffic engineers really need to tell Oregon how it's done.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:58 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Sharrow markings are typically (and properly) only found on bicycle
>> routes that do not have dedicated bicycle lanes, and bicycle boulevards.
>
I really need to get the River Parks Authority here in touch with Portland
and Seattle on how it's done... MUPs suck for everyone involved, but a
pedestrian-free cycleway with a vehicle-free sidewalk works wonders.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at
19 matches
Mail list logo
