Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 3/29/2011 6:04 AM, Peter Gervai wrote: Hello, I would like to propose a few additions: landuse=residential illegal=yes: residence of an illegal immigrant No, it would be houses built on someone else's land, or on area where it wasn't allowed. So what happens in the case of a dispute, whe

Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread Peter Gervai
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:18, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On 3/29/2011 6:04 AM, Peter Gervai wrote: >>> I would like to propose a few additions: >>> landuse=residential illegal=yes: residence of an illegal immigrant >> >> No, it would be houses built on someone else's land, or on area where >> it

[Tagging] Retaking the discussion on ATMs

2011-03-29 Thread Noel David Torres Taño
Hello all: ** setting It has been retaken in the spanish list the discussion about how to tag ATMs. Important things user need to know: Which bank (like Banco Popular), which network (like Servired) Not so important things user can use: name (ATM proper name, can be mall name or street name),

Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/3/29 Peter Gervai : > shouldn't care about specific parts of it, unless they're separate > objects (which I guess never being the case, at least I've never > observed a crop created by a dozen polygons describing corn, wheat and > marijuana separately :-)). In fact they should. I mean not ne

Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread Bill Ricker
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > >> I would like to propose a few additions: >> landuse=residential illegal=yes: It's a couple days early for Poison d'Avril / April Fools ? Is this serious? Under the usual rule-of-thumb, to map what's visible on the ground (signed or bu

Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread Richard Welty
On 3/29/11 8:09 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2 In fact they should. I mean not necessarily for different plants, but for different adjacent crops. Mapping single crops is enhancing the map with detail about the topological layout of an area. i'm of two minds on this. farmers do occasionally s

Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread Peter Gervai
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 15:21, Bill Ricker wrote: > Under the usual rule-of-thumb, to map what's visible on the ground > (signed or built), Like smoothness=, incline=, etc? > "Illegal use", in those words or similar. (Or tagged so by a suitably > free Govt GIS file.) Incidentally sometimes that

[Tagging] new Draft on detailed bike shops

2011-03-29 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
Federico Cozzi has made a draft for detailed bicycle shop mapping. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shop:bicycle Please comment in the propopal's talk page. I am announcing here because he is not signed up to tagging. cheers, Martin _

Re: [Tagging] new Draft on detailed bike shops

2011-03-29 Thread Dave F.
On 29/03/2011 15:53, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: Federico Cozzi has made a draft for detailed bicycle shop mapping. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shop:bicycle Not very detailed, as there's nothing on it. :). Is that the correct link? Found this one: http://wiki.openstre

Re: [Tagging] new Draft on detailed bike shops

2011-03-29 Thread Gregory Williams
> -Original Message- > From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com] > Sent: 29 March 2011 16:23 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Tagging] new Draft on detailed bike shops > > On 29/03/2011 15:53, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > Federico Cozzi has made a draft for detailed bi

Re: [Tagging] new Draft on detailed bike shops

2011-03-29 Thread Andrew Cleveland
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 16:33 +0100, Gregory Williams wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com] > > Sent: 29 March 2011 16:23 > > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] new Draft on detailed bike shops > > > > On 29/03/2011 15:53, M∡rt

Re: [Tagging] new Draft on detailed bike shops

2011-03-29 Thread Dave F.
On 29/03/2011 16:33, Gregory Williams wrote: -Original Message- From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com] Sent: 29 March 2011 16:23 To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Tagging] new Draft on detailed bike shops On 29/03/2011 15:53, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: Federico Cozzi ha

Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread Bill Ricker
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Richard Welty wrote: > farmers do occasionally shift the boundaries between different > crops, so like anything else on a map, this is subject to bit rot. any till & plant farmer who doesn't rotate his crops regularly needs to go back to Aggie school. -- Bill @n

Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/3/29 Richard Welty : > On 3/29/11 8:09 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> 2 >> In fact they should. I mean not necessarily for different plants, but >> for different adjacent crops. Mapping single crops is enhancing the >> map with detail about the topological layout of an area. > > i'm of two

Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread Richard Welty
On 3/29/11 12:14 PM, Bill Ricker wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Richard Welty wrote: farmers do occasionally shift the boundaries between different crops, so like anything else on a map, this is subject to bit rot. any till& plant farmer who doesn't rotate his crops regularly needs t

Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread Richard Welty
On 3/29/11 12:35 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2011/3/29 Richard Welty: farmers do occasionally shift the boundaries between different crops, so like anything else on a map, this is subject to bit rot. In Germany or Italy this is not the case. The might shift inside a crop if they have growi

Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/3/29 Richard Welty : > On 3/29/11 12:35 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > in the US, it's a distinct possibility that a farmer in Iowa might buy > a 200 acre field and plant it 1/2 corn, 1/2 soybeans and rotate > which half is which from year to year. so do you want to map fields > as legal own

Re: [Tagging] new Draft on detailed bike shops

2011-03-29 Thread ael
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 04:41:51PM +0100, Dave F. wrote: > >>>Federico Cozzi has made a draft for detailed bicycle shop mapping. > >>> > >>>http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shop:bicycle > >>Not very detailed, as there's nothing on it. :). > That's the same link. In latest Firefo

Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread Peter Gervai
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 19:53, Richard Welty wrote: > which half is which from year to year. so do you want to map fields > as legal ownership, which is one boundary, or as sections which are > planted differently from each other, which is another? Not making a problem about subject ;-) I think

Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread Pierre-Alain Dorange
Nathan Edgars II wrote: > So what happens in the case of a dispute, where two entities claim the > same land? I think OSM has nothing to do with such a question. We talk about geography and map, not legal issue. -- Pierre-Alain Dorange OSM experiences :

Re: [Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

2011-03-29 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Peter Gervai wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 15:21, Bill Ricker wrote: >> Under the usual rule-of-thumb, to map what's visible on the ground >> (signed or built), > > Like smoothness=, incline=, etc? Those are simple, measurable things. "illegal use" is not as